Message from @busillis
Discord ID: 781959618132967455
Humorous for sure
When I see people linking news from a site that looks like this, then I just have this sort of visceral reaction
Like how can you trust that, are you born yesterday etc.
That's news?
No
I'm just saying that people sometimes link news from really seedy sites that look like that
The Onion
The onion doesn't have "repair your skin" gotse
Lol
Just checking... first casualty of censorship is humor.
Or at least one of the first
Here's some real news. The activist PA judicial apparatus are in on the conspiracy.
https://youtu.be/rapZnUMQmkc
If SCOTUS shoots them down, we know it goes all the way to the top. This is all about taking one man down at any cost.
Im not sure i trust FOX either
All they did was show a tweet. They did not compose the tweet...orrrrr did they?
@Zuluzeit I don't think the trump appeals will amount to anything other than a vehicle to raise money and I'm not sure that that's not the true motivation.
You're kidding, right?
Which part?
How about this...go to Google and search antifa.com
@busillis I think their primary motive is to keep the base agitated in order to keep their options open. The money is a side gig but I agree that it seems to be an intentional one.
Oh god you are trying to make him explode
This isn't a money making apparatus. It is a monumental assault on the integrity of America!
Matter antimatter reaction forthcoming
Lmao
I find it funny that they go to the "Activist Judges" card against a panel led by a Trump appointee over Bush 43 appointees.
Q is running antifa. It's a double double cross. Wake up before it's too late.
It's hard to disagree with the Monumental assault premise.
@busillis, you just advanced to level 7!
All these trollisms make the conversation very confusing
For any unaware readers: people are being extremely sarcastic
@TaLoN132 That's how deep this goes. Those judges spent their careers acting like conservatives just in case Trump was ever president so they could conspire against him.
And some are being extremely serious
🤦♂️
As funny as it is, I don't think this sarcasm is constructive
It will lead to lots of arguments and frustration over misunderstandings
Yeah, there's nothing solid linking these claims to the actual definitions of the what they allege
@realz it would be a good thing to find out the extent of election fraud once and for all.
I doubt that will happen
Who can disagree with this