I am not talking to you. Everything you say is wrong. Go watch 30 hours of videos to learn something.

Probably... there is so much going on... nobody will be right 100%.

That and the human component makes it even harder as that is never a factual component

Clearly doesn’t want your help

Good morning everyone, I see this conversation isn't working out too well.

Uhu, now keep reading...

That reaction was made because yes, it is not possible to give you insight in every single claim made

Just a little hiccup

Try refuting the constitutionality argument though.

Morning maw! Sleep well?

I woke up 3-4 different times (semi-normal), but for the most part yes. Thank you for asking!

Ppl just get way too emotional 😪

Same thing lately... getting old i gues

Oh this has happened for a long while, since I was in my early/mid-twenties.

Yeah character flaw of mine when it's a subject i care about.

Which is where i am ... ish..

I think the PA supreme court ruled on the unconstitutionality argument last night and it didn't fly, no?

Then you're still very young, and you should cherish every moment you have with your youth!

Am I right in sayin PA has gone slightly rogue?

In the parnell case it didnt

Unless there is an update

Don’t sweat it just recognize when you’re getting emotional and bring it back. It doesn’t help your arguments to be getting emotional

As far as i know, the parnell case claiming constitutionallity was accepted on its merrits

The trump case gor dismissed with prejudice... but that was just a call to amend the claim no?

Pa sc is totally rogue the opinion in the lasted case is ridiculous. Dismissed bc the claim wasnt brought in a timely manner such bs

The opinion was more elegant than that. It was based on the convenient timing of the objection to the constitutionality and that American voters voted in good faith.

Yet if they guy brought the claim earlier he would’ve been dismissed for lacking standing bc he wasn’t a candidate at the time of the regulation being passed. Totally political ruling it’s horrible

Yeah I agree I read the opinion I’m just paraphrasing

Maybe political, idk. But that the Trump appointee wrote the opinion was probably not mere coincidence.

Zulu. Insight on my parnell comment?

Hang on. Let me find it.

Thanks. I though as i said. It was challenging the const. Of mail in.

And was accepted. With opinion stating it might win on merrit.

Dont kbow what the relief asked was though

To me the logic to dismiss is ridiculous. Maybe I’m biased but after reading the constitution it’s seems very clear that act 77 is unconstitutional now determining a fair remedy is the issue. If the opinion was based on the claim that’s a diff story it was dismissed bc of a procedural/technicality reason that’s why I say it’s political

What about military absentee ballots though?

Looks like all the government wants Trump out office

Should we disenfranchise overseas voters?

Isn’t there a difference between Mail-in and absentee? Genuinely asking

Universal mail-in and absentee? Sure.

The military also has a few more options and extra leeway than the average person.

> Zulu. Insight on my parnell comment?
@andrasol Yes, that's the one we were talking about.

E.g: They can cast ballots before the ballots are actually printed in the state.