I didn't know, but if you say so then sure

I mean Arizona is a hearing it's just kind of a other unofficial sham hearing I liked the MI one even though it never should have happened

there is no excuse ever to impede transparency in the election

there are many good excuses not to try the POTUS

but as I said before, I didn't follow the impeachment

I agree that it should take more than a simple majority, but I don't know how much more.

No you didn’t @nachik were against the impediment by trump during the impeaching hearings , (even though you say the house was after trump for a long time) . Similar to how trump declared voter fraud long before the election and we all knew he would claim it and drag out the election process months ago

I had no opinion because, as I said before, I was totally out of the loop

Well with this new information

On the issue of impediment

but if you say he impeded something to do with transparency, then yea that's wrong

Any signal can be tapped with sophisticated equipment only here we are 2020 and paper ballot hacking. Lol

If he had not impeded he very well may not be president right now @nachik

In the impeachment people from trumps administration wanted to testify to how he was involved with he Russia crimes. He said executive privilege you can't hear what they say but also if they did testify you would know I'm completely innocent. Then the senate said we dont care what Trump does we wont lift a finger tldr

@Dedkraken yeah Ukraine but yeah basically

I'm unfamiliar with the process in the US but wasn't Clinton impeached and then carried on just fine?

we don't have impeachment here

The only hope for the future. I like the tea party ideal of logic, only need the right Kennedy for the position...bahaha

@inwa, you just advanced to level 8!

Ukraine

The house brings the charges. The senate gives them the boot.

In the house @nachik but in the republican controlled senate would not call the witnesses willing to testify

and that wasn't known from the get go?

They even said they would work hand in hand with trump which breaks their oath to be impartial jurors

impeached but not convicted late in his second term. He was already lame duck. Just became lamer, so to speak.

honestly these panto acts are just boring, both with Clinton and Trump

Which is why I would take the senate win

So trump can actually be held accountable if he does anymore shenaggains if he steals the election by ignoring the voters

everybody knew Clinton lied and nobody cared

We saw it with Shadow.inc and Pete. Everything is a diabolical sham. I give up. What's the weather in Spain or Bolivia? Iran isn't in there like doing doing Shia shit, right?

I have no idea what your are talking about who is Pete @inwa

I think ideally the dems wanted to interview people to force the Senate's hand or get voted out but instead they just pretended he was innocent after covering it all up.

Yup @Dedkraken

Like Al Capone I dont know how all the witnesses died I guess I never committed a crime.

@nachik she was constantly under investigation from the republican house

Or senate I don’t remember

When we killed bin laden did we have evidence he committed all those crimes?

Actually... I don't think he lied. When he was asked the question about did he have sexual relations, he asked for a definition of sexual relations. The definition he was given that it was "the touching of another person's genitals with the intention of giving them sexual gratification". In his mind, he could honestly say that he did not engage in sexual relations, because he could care less if she was gratified at all. So, based on the supplied definition, he told the truth.

the story of Al Capone is a story of miscarriage of law sold as a win

People cared that Clinton lied that's why she was so loathed on her own side

lol @TaLoN132 are you serious with the "sex with that woman" thing?