Message from @Maw
Discord ID: 783375282844598302
Any attorney worth their salt would know doing so would risk them getting disbarred
All of this destruction of evidence, while it may be detrimental to the state level cases, perhaps it’s helpful in the looming scotus ruling?
It's why there's a strict procedure and even harsher punishment for disclosing all relevant information to the opposing party
Are you talking about the Act 77 take?
Just a sec...
I already got it.
About 40:25
https://twitter.com/codemonkeyz/status/1333641704839147520?s=21 anyone have thoughts on this? Can anything be made conclusive from this video? At work and can’t watch
It would be hard to convince a judge of anything suspicious going on there
Guy just looks like regular IT support
@Maw My question really pertained to Robert's take around 46:25 where he asserts that Republicans challenged Act 77 in Sept.
Is “it support” permitted on tabulation machines at the time that footage was recorded?
I have no doubt something suspicious is going on, just playing devil's advocate here
cause you're going to need convince someone taking an impartial stance that something funny is going on
Sorta like how lawyers practice cross-examination with their own witnesses
I understand they passed one version in Sept of 2019 and then an amended version of that in Sept of this year?
I think that's around the ball park
What were the details of the amended version?
Oh.
You're talking about the lawsuit, yea, they did.
was it consistent with the State Const. ?
Robert mentioned something about them dismissing on very narrow grounds, as if they were just fishing for reasons not to reward relief or something like that in last night's stream
His words, not mine.
Actually it was the DNC that filed it.
Apparently.
Just them? Who are the current plaintiffs on the record individually?
The DNC, as it states in the opinion.
Robert didn't say it was the republicans though.
Oh wow, in other news there's a petition to recall Gav Newsom's governorship with already 8 million signatures
Not surprised.
Brownouts and lockdowns tend to piss people off.
I smell fraud. Better verify every one of those signatures.
I can't blame people for wanting to keep open if they aren't going to get any covid relief funds, nor if they know their employees won't be able to get onto unemployment
I would like to see the signatures verified though.
We've seen them be fraudulent this year.
In MI.