Which they are wiping from the machines in Georgia

@Maw I'd be interested in your take, as well...

What legitimate reason could they have to not hold onto that data?

Following procedure perhaps but I cant speak to their reason or motive

WOW

following procedure 🤣

What are they still verifying 3 recounts in 😂

“Our procedure is to destroy the evidence”

You never discard evidence in a liability or criminal suit

Even it's something as trivial as an evelope

@TaLoN132 Can you give me a timestamp of Robert's response? I half pay attention in the streams because I'm modding chat.

Any attorney worth their salt would know doing so would risk them getting disbarred

All of this destruction of evidence, while it may be detrimental to the state level cases, perhaps it’s helpful in the looming scotus ruling?

It's why there's a strict procedure and even harsher punishment for disclosing all relevant information to the opposing party

@TaLoN132 Might have found it.

Are you talking about the Act 77 take?

@TaLoN132 Yes.

Just a sec...

I already got it.

About 40:25

https://twitter.com/codemonkeyz/status/1333641704839147520?s=21 anyone have thoughts on this? Can anything be made conclusive from this video? At work and can’t watch

It would be hard to convince a judge of anything suspicious going on there

Guy just looks like regular IT support

@Maw My question really pertained to Robert's take around 46:25 where he asserts that Republicans challenged Act 77 in Sept.

Is “it support” permitted on tabulation machines at the time that footage was recorded?

I have no doubt something suspicious is going on, just playing devil's advocate here

cause you're going to need convince someone taking an impartial stance that something funny is going on

Sorta like how lawyers practice cross-examination with their own witnesses

@TaLoN132 He didn't, I don't believe? He said the state SC did.

I understand they passed one version in Sept of 2019 and then an amended version of that in Sept of this year?

I think that's around the ball park

Yes, the state SC legislated from the bench in Sept 2020.

What were the details of the amended version?

Oh.

You're talking about the lawsuit, yea, they did.

was it consistent with the State Const. ?

Robert mentioned something about them dismissing on very narrow grounds, as if they were just fishing for reasons not to reward relief or something like that in last night's stream

His words, not mine.

Actually it was the DNC that filed it.

Apparently.

Just them? Who are the current plaintiffs on the record individually?