Message from @TW20
Discord ID: 783605987046195230
What do you mean it happened in 2004 and 2017?
Lots of states dont control faithless electors but it's still rare
Congress is being woken up to what's really happening.
Objections were made. Attempted by Democrats in 2017 when Hillary lost to Trump. It got no support. Happened in 2004 with Gore, it also got no support. But from what Matt Gaete says, there seems to be support for Trump if it happens Jan 6 because of compelling testimony
Yeah GOP congress is real woke
So, it doesn’t matter what we believe about witnesses
Hahaha
@TW20 no it’s because it’s been like three weeks since the election like two recounts that match the machines and they have to gear up for the run off ,also I don’t even think the machines were wiped or going to be wiped but I have to check
Hillary lost in 2016 they went back after?
Why is the name of the file show the date as 10/31?
Jill Stein asked for a recount in 2016 and they didn’t find anything
Hillary technically lost Jan 6, 2017
It's just the first in a long list of files.
Here's the list https://github.com/Bitcadia/DownBallot/blob/master/GAScrape.ts
Trump didn’t win until Jan 6, 2017
Jan 6 is the magical date.
I think it’s called dueling electors
Here’s an article about it
So I will leave everyone to their squabbles, sorry for the interruption gn all😁
Hey look a young Kate McKinnon , looks exactly like Elizabeth warren https://youtu.be/xvb7lL1CqIM
Thanks... I'm checking it out.
Also if anybody's interested in non bullshit rejection rates for absentee ballots (read not articles created after it became an issue in this election) https://www.eac.gov/sites/default/files/eac_assets/1/6/2016_EAVS_Comprehensive_Report.pdf
Hell, it was even causing panic beforehand https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/amid-historic-absentee-voting-rejected-mail-ballots-could-have
People take presidential elections more seriously especially this one
Ugh they are rehashing agilis again 😃
The connection between the Clinton Foundation and the company that controls the election software and hardware in 30 states, is legitimate cause for concern. The fact that said company obtained contracts for election software and hardware in 30 states in the five years between its partnership with the Clinton foundation in the 2020 election is scandalous. You can banter back-and-forth about proof of election fraud or lack there of, but the fact remains this connection alone, did and should have been a cause for great concern to conservative voters nationally. The downplaying of it did not help. The result of ignoring blatant conflicts of interest by 30 SOS and legislators that chose to contract with Dominion, is significant loss of faith in the election process by all fair minded voters. If you don’t understand this, then your bias is preventing you from grasping the gravity of it.
@LeslieW, you just advanced to level 1!
Your friend Mr. Kreb at the DHS-CISA, is either a complete idiot, or a blatant perpetrator of massive election fraud. The following is from the “election security” tab of CISA’s .gov site and its partnership with CIS. Scroll to page 3.
It’s at the bottom
So you think if the Clinton Foundation buys voting machines for other countries that what the kickback is rigged elections?
@Dedkraken no.... I’m not done. But, it definitely undermines confidence in dominion voting systems.
Undermines it how?
You know the answer to that
@TW20, you just advanced to level 7!
Here’s a few of the information pages and Google searches Associated with the contributors to this handbook.
Did you notice the date that this report was published?