Hence why they are prone to the more cult like mentality as I explained the other day

Must be nice to completely dismiss people because you just presume they're grifting.

I watch his videos

I listen for language and emphasis and it’s all marketing to one group , there is no consistency of outrage

It’s clear as day

All this tech experts. All happened to be ex military and government employees... im guessing it give them more validity to their words. Than mark Mark Zuckerberg or the smartest guy in MIT and Harvard

Good for him

Make that cash

Trump does it

"Clear as day."

K bud

He clickbaits his videos for sure.

But that's like, something everyone does.

The idea that he's portraying to be something he's not though is kinda amusing, not going to lie.

That’s not the only kind of grifting.

You could have no real personal stake but still thrown in your own personality every now and again

Barr is gonna get canned next 😅

But if you don’t see it you don’t see it

Oh, so we're diluting the term 'grifter' now as well.

No

There is no diluting of the term

You are.

No

The idea of being a grifter came from being a swindler.

A con-man.

You can have different gradients of personal beliefs and still play to a crowd

So are you claiming that you know what Tim Pool is thinking?

A party must petition the SCOTUS to issue a Writ of Certiorari.
https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/about-educational-outreach/activity-resources/supreme-1

I am claiming he is inconsistent in his outrage and only slants right and makes excuses for them. He markets to them because he knows that base well

And that pays well so why change

... sounds like you're describing being a partisan.

Where is the grifting coming into the picture?

Like I said if you want to live in a fantasy that you just take people at their word fine

Because you **think** he doesn't hold these views?

By that same measure, Pakman and Destiny are grifters as well.

it’s because he is inconsistent with his stated views

How so?

What he believes is irrelevant, for example he will take a particular action on the left and give reasons for not liking it but then never addressing it if it happens on the right. He knows if he ever takes a critical angle of the right he would lose support

It’s not a hard business model to follow

That's literally being a partisan.

How do you know what he believes?