Message from @TaLoN132
Discord ID: 784562401784758352
While claiming not to be
Which he could very well believe.
Again
His behavior should not be predictable if he truly believes what he claims
???
Did you just make the argument -- unintentionally -- that religions aren't predictable?
Limited understanding is healthy. Average people most likely would have difficulty coping with raw truth.
For a long time, gun owners have said that everyone having guns would reduce violence. Libs rejected that idea. Then the fear of what would happen if food supplies were compromised during the pandemic set in and they saw the light... And then... they figured out that shooting is really fun. Soon, all tags will be lotteries and you'll be wishing libs went back to hating guns. 😄
Like for example would he ever being up a purely left wing article legitimately attacking the right and then title his videos accordingly. @Maw and then talk about it for like 3 hours
No he would never do anything to Rock the boat of his base. Especially before Trump lost
@james j I'm going to use an analogy that sort of was just brought up by Doc. Just because you believe you're incredibly intelligent, doesn't mean you are.
Regardless of his motivations, it sounds like good business to me.
Truth or constructed realities?
Also religious people at some point realize they are being hypocritical. They just capitulate to social pressure for ease of life. Half your prosperity gospel preachers are out there scamming their congregation @Maw
With superchats Q. Lol
I'm pretty sure a lot of folks never have this "awakening" you claim.
@Maw you want to address the inconsistencies I pointed out with Tim pool
@TaLoN132 Just a model of the human mind. Your truths are your association of data you have been exposed to. A model of the world. Always very different from the world as is.
I believe you said.
That is not true. It is the communicators responsibility to be understood and the comunicee(?) responsible for understanding, according to Wittgenstein.
No you haven’t , you just appeal to partisan ship and saying it’s perfectly fine if you believe you aren’t being partisan. Under your logic grifters don’t exist until they say I don’t believe what I am saying @Maw even prosperity gospel person is not a grifter. They just believe what they are saying.
My way of defining grifting is more useful in my opinion.
Here I find myself not having the slightest idea what "grifting actually means.
Under your definition you can’t claim cnn and msnbc is left leaning and Fox News is right leaning. You just accept that they are fair and balanced @Maw
Because they believe it
That doesn't believe in the product, sure.
Maybe, while I have hunted, and learned how, hunting is not my primary reason for owning firearms. Warren v. DC... While every officer I know would gladly do whatever they need to, to protect people they have no actual duty to protect individual citizens, just the community as a whole. So as the adage goes When seconds count police are minutes away.
and with the bATFe loving to redefine established definitions to suit themselves because there is ambiguity in the actual statutes (re: Bump Stock Ban) (on going issues with pistol braces) creates issues. The bump stock ban gives them a precedent to use as a justification to change how they define firearms and accessories despite the fact that I think they were stupid doesn't mean that banning them after years of issuing letters of compliance was acceptable.
@AntiFish03, you just advanced to level 6!
@Maw Anyone can believe in any product. Humans are good at selection bias.
Whatever I’m gonna maintain you guys are blind and will just believe whatever resonates with you.