I think this is more like a cop pulling someone over for speeding and letting them off with a warning because they were racing to take their pregnant wife to the hospital because she was in labor.

This was not a permanent change to the law, from what I can tell.

@JD~Jordan. Exactly forward looking. That is for the Legislature to correct. This was an interpretation not a Constitutional issue.

Well.... that was my opinion. That this was a matter of the PA Supreme Court interpreting the law. But @Maw appears to be saying that the PA SC went well beyond interpreting and was actually legislating from the bench, which of course would be Unconstitutional

Most of these issues are handled after and applied to the next case

Hopefully the pa gop will be more careful next time

Yeah. Its seems obvious that the PA Legislature needs to revisit the law. Ive worked in a few law offices and it has always surprised me that some most laws are so lacking in detail. But, perhaps in this case they need to be very specific.

There are tons of examples of poor legislation.

Usages of may in place of shall.

https://tomluongo.me/2020/12/05/argentina-first-to-fall-to-opposition-to-great-reset-whos-next/

Yeppers... and I have seen courts interpret "shall" as simply being "can if they choose".

I think they need to say "must" when its a requirement....

Rekita says shall is “must”

Did you know that Giuliani tested positive for covid?

Yeah

Damn his ass might die

It’s either pardon prison or covid. I am just waiting for Trump to turn on him at some point. Didn’t guliani say he has insurance or something regarding Trump turning on him

I think there is a reason that the full US SC was divided on this case. Isn't this the one that they voted 4-4 - letting it stand? This was the PA SC allowing the Sec of State some discretion on ensuring that pandemic did not have a negative impact on the ability of PA citizens to vote. It was a one-time allowance - not a permanent change to the vote. I still think it is like a cop pulling over a speeder and letting them go without ticketing them because of a wife in labor. The cop didn't change the speed limit, just took into consideration the exigent circumstances.

@TaLoN132, you just advanced to level 28!

I haven't been watching this bullahit...

It's more fun to speculate on a bunch of crap that I don't know about.

Not that read a news article is actually going to tell me anything.

You seem to be particularly adept at that... I like it. 😉

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/georgia-governor-rebuffs-trump-s-call-for-special-session-to-overturn-election-results-top-official-says/ar-BB1bG9i7?ocid=msedgntp

Go to new submission

@busillis this is a everyday thing normal.in Argentina..

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dershowitz-supreme-court-georgia-election-challenge

@meglide why media keep making this guy relevant .. he is involved with the Pedophiles Epstein ... im guessing the more they show him the more innocent he looks

Dershowitz is a scuzzy guy... like big time. Also a bit of a media whore

He doesn't bother me. It's always like legal theory musing or something.

I liked seeing him get demolished by finklestien https://youtu.be/WZzIJDiedrQ

Obama resigned his senate seat in November. Why hasn't Kamala resigned?

Because Senate votes might become relevant. Watcha think?

LOL... seriously? That is your concern? Trump hasn't conceded and you wonder why she hasn't resigned?

@leftingfighter33 cmon man

I hope that cmon man phrase takes off in a meme way

Well, biden is president elect, why worry about him conceding or not?

Passing of stimulus bills etc

Why wouldn't ypu resign if you know for sure you won?

Like obama did

Why would see resign given all the important legislation that might be coming?

And wouldn't it make a shit ton more sense for her to resign after Trump concedes?

Once the runoffs are over it would be a good time to resign