Ooooooh I missed the obvious part.

The Trump campaign isnt denying the existence of the PAC its public record. As is what happens after a campaign when a PAC becomes dead that's just basic political knowledge. You are comparing that to some grand conspiracy of imaginary things 😂

One has proof (PAC finances)... One doesn't (unsubstantiated fraud claims that don't stand up to scrutiny)... The irony is one that is obviously provable is disputed... One that lacks any proof is not. But nice try... That's a real zinger.

I love it... Every time when faced with logic - Trump supporters resort to name calling.

Not a trump supporter

Again, I want this country broken up

Trump is the best method

You have to be pretty obstinate for Trump and his campaign to brag about how much money they are stuffing in his slush fund and still say I'm not seeing any wrongdoing here 🤣😂🤣

... Elaborate?

If Trump wins with this election being fraudulent, The west coast will basically immediately seceede.

Lmfao bank records...but 'look at all these credible fraud claims'

Trump supporter or not... You tend to resort to name calling when you read something you don't like.

That doesn't make you not a tool

It’s not a tactic of one side, it’s a last resort when you are losing an argument.

Your snark is why I called you a tool

"A real zinger" - a tool

Normally means you need to dig a little deeper.

What's the opposite argument to Trump is raising cash to dole out to his family? He is raising the money to help his campaign? His campaign is literally over.

I'm sure he is doing that

I’m not sure he’s doing that lol.

Aside from assumptions is there any facts you’re basing that off of?

That's what PAC's are obviously for.

It's an inference based on sound reasoning about what happens to money.

@Dedkraken see if you can get some official looking bank records up on newsmax. It will be the gospel.

No questions asked.

Your opinion matters so much to me... Please like me. I don't know how I'll go on without your validation.

Newsmax is probably running a story about Biden robbing the PAC with ninja assassins

If Trump did not appear to fight he might lose support in his base, though I would argue he's losing support anyway. The end game is to burn down the grand old party, which I'm all about, my desire is the Democrat machine will be torch too.

Lol. Why is this all so heated?

@Dedkraken exactly. Evidence is evidence by virtue of the source.

No more personal attacks. This stops now, if you can't be civil with one another then we can't let you be a part of the conversation here. I want everyone to be able to discuss in this channel without the fear of being chastised and demeaned.

The next people to make personal attacks on another person will be kicked from the server, and if it continues from there, it leaves me no option but to ban people.

I hope this makes things abundantly clear to folks. Keep a lid on your tempers.

@DrSammyD be nice.
@TaLoN132 thats a offensive generalization i don't appreciate. I haven't called u any names. In fact I've done my best to understand ur position. The reward for my patience is getting generalize. Not very nice.

#2020 burn it all

@Maw laying down the ban hammer.

As a side note, this thing is really starting to get interesting now that TX is suing other states. That’s pretty gnarly.

question: what does it mean for a scotus case to be "docketed"?

does "docketed" mean they have agreed to hear the case? or does it mean they can still decline it?

@Zuluzeit what fraud claims are u referencing?

What name did I call you??? I have never called anyone on this server a name - from what I recall. I questioned a position you had - trying to point out the irony.

askiing because the texas case has been docketed, but idk what that means lol

> @Zuluzeit what fraud claims are u referencing?
@♤amanda any