Message from @AdvanceManExtraordinaire
Discord ID: 786266449232265237
These are NOT frivolous lawsuits
Is there a legal, constitutional process for challenging the results of an election? If so, is it being followed?
Should election fraud just be allowed?
Of course they are. Trump promised for months leading to the election if he lost he would cry fraud and refuse to adhere to peaceful transfer. He laid out his lies before he made them.
Yes, the states can either not send electors or the legislature can choose their own.
False
Look, the states have said they broke their own constitutions.
They just don't care
So if the president knew there was a plan for fraud, he should’ve kept quiet?
It's 'Too big to fail'
They have proven zero fraud in court since election. Not even a tiny case.
That's their position.
Why would he know a plan for fraud? They what shared it with him? He made it up.
If they broke their own rules, doesn’t the Supreme Court have the duty to bring justice?
Read PA's response, when asked to respond to Alito, they say, "this is too big! you can't change this!"
PA's arguments weren't even "we didn't violate our constitution" it was you can't do this because it opens Pandora's box
Yes
Of course they do. They've disenfranchised 140 million people.
But the question is, will they
This is why the suits continue.
Frankly the state supreme courts should have handled it
Or are you merely claiming that if there WAS a DNC plan for fraud, CNN would’ve been privy to it and reported it months ago.
SCOTUS is not going to say .. dump all those electoral votes and give it to Trump
Yup continuing to prove that there wasnt fraud.
Everyone saying Trump is losing his lawsuits is ridiculous. Like Robert said they aren't even considering the merits of allowing discovery, no one is looking into anything. Not even considering anything. Finding technicalities to throw things out
Now the DNC and CNN are involved too? Not even Sidney Powells insane disproven conspiracies included them.
I think people saying that either haven’t watched Robert’s analyses or aren’t intelligent enough to understand them.
This is very good news
If you're a defense contractor.
We get to keep our permanent wars of aggression nothing like those hard leftist warmongering Democrats and peaceful Republicans.
All that proves is that there was FULL denial of legitimate due process and appellate rights!
When a court says even if we let this go forward obviously you arent making a case to overturn the election that's not a technicality.
So if trump knew about a plan for election fraud, should he have kept quiet about it leading up to the election? Yes or no.
One might consider the idea that if that information was known it would likely be classified.
> So if trump knew about a plan for election fraud, should he have kept quiet about it leading up to the election? Yes or no.
@AdvanceManExtraordinaire He should have found someone in a position of power to do something about it.
You are theorizing things so grandiose not even the least honest POTUS claimed them. Irrelevant.
SCOTUS and the country will lose more if They handed the next 4 years to Trump..
What could a president do about a plan for election fraud, other than fight legal battles in the specific states it’s planned to prevent it from happening?