Message from @AdvanceManExtraordinaire
Discord ID: 786265578850615306
Greg Teufel “But it is the case that even after people take office in an election if they prove fraud down the road, even years into someone’s term, they can invalidate an election after the fact or order special elections to replace a person who was fraudulently elected.” So really, there are no hard dates if it can be proven.
@Dreadnaught where do u see the other states
That’s getting revised by the minute. Perhaps that one is already outdated?
States ask the Court to Intervene.
Yay more censorship. As Obama, put it, common folks aren’t capable of thinking for themselves.
Backup any YouTube vids you wanna keep
Why would democrats join? Their goal isn't to get Biden elected, it's to destroy the constitution. They've already won. They want to get the box cars and furnaces going.
About time youtube 🤐
@thebrodys my opinion is if u.dont wanna be censored dont use their app. Their business their rules
They need to stop letting the government boss them around
Let’s vet ready to RUMBLE!
How many lawsuits will it take for Trump to figure out he lost? Usually its zero.
@Dreadnaught defamation.. countersued. Alot of dirt will come out
If you think patriots & veterans are going to stand by and allow people to take a dump on our constitution, you are mistaken. They will file as many as it takes and do what needs to be done.
@Repeat, you just advanced to level 19!
Frivolous lawsuits undermining and trying to steal an election from the president elect dump on the Constitution. Winning an election does not.
These are NOT frivolous lawsuits
Is there a legal, constitutional process for challenging the results of an election? If so, is it being followed?
Should election fraud just be allowed?
Of course they are. Trump promised for months leading to the election if he lost he would cry fraud and refuse to adhere to peaceful transfer. He laid out his lies before he made them.
Yes, the states can either not send electors or the legislature can choose their own.
False
Look, the states have said they broke their own constitutions.
They just don't care
So if the president knew there was a plan for fraud, he should’ve kept quiet?
It's 'Too big to fail'
They have proven zero fraud in court since election. Not even a tiny case.
That's their position.
Why would he know a plan for fraud? They what shared it with him? He made it up.
If they broke their own rules, doesn’t the Supreme Court have the duty to bring justice?
Read PA's response, when asked to respond to Alito, they say, "this is too big! you can't change this!"
PA's arguments weren't even "we didn't violate our constitution" it was you can't do this because it opens Pandora's box
Yes
Of course they do. They've disenfranchised 140 million people.
But the question is, will they
Are you claiming to have all of the information the POTUS has at all times?
This is why the suits continue.
Frankly the state supreme courts should have handled it