Message from @AdvanceManExtraordinaire
Discord ID: 786288109050527844
And get your ideological Outlook grounded in something other than political forces rhetoric.
It makes you look stupid as hell.
Are you familiar with critical theory?
They're both authoritarian as s*** and that's my problem.
The GOP even blamed Dems for all the cases they voluntarily dismissed like why didnt you let us finish.
If you have no basis and what intellectuals consider to be classical liberalism you can't critically think because you don't have the rules of the game.
Unless we're arguing popular entertainment I mean news
When they asked Trump why he dismissed the case he said we won it was our plan to not win and just cause chaos and take the electors
Other than a basic definition and what I have been able to glean from conversations, not really....
Into the critical observer that's amply clear.
I’m not sure if this is a more academic explanation for critical theory, but I’m referring to the practical implementation of it, like equity based hiring so a business demographics meet the population’s demographics. As done in South Africa.
It's easier to win when you use someone else's made up rules of the game... Plus it benefits the purveyors of such nonsense.
How is this honest attempts at lawsuits? How are Dems responsible?
Oh no withdrawing is winning. Our goal was election theft not proving fraud 😂
A competent leader could have even done that and kept it hidden but Trump always just boldly admits his nefarious plans.
Oh I didn't even get that you were talking about critical race theory? I'm missing the whole thread of what you're saying I believe that's critical race theory is a very authoritarian motif.
Regarding Chinese influence in politics: I don’t see how the green new deal, as presented in Biden’s platform, can be seen as anything other than yielding energy and manufacturing power to China.
Ah yes. Critical race theory being just one branch of critical theory. It permeates other institutions as well, like STEM.
Critical race theory and socialism don't have anything to do with one another in my view other than a socialist government implementing authoritarianism through a flawed construct.
@AdvanceManExtraordinaire go back to your initial thesis I'm not even sure what you're talking about .
I agree with that to an extent. I actually see critical race theory and the new lefts implementation of it as closer to a form of fascism than mere socialism. There is too much race theory intertwined with the merging of the state and corporate world .
Progressives wish Biden supported the green new deal or any of their policy or even put a remotely left choice in his cabinet. Looking far more like Obama 2.0
Biden has green new dream in his platform
Yeah like progressives dream about green policies and then they wake up
And pay 39 cents a kwh.
I don't follow you... Because we place restrictions on ourselves that are not enforced on them?
A big part of it is that coal and fossil fuels are an incredible storage of energy.
Can anyone really deny the suspicious way the vote tally seemed to be so lopsided for Biden when all the counting was supposedly stopped but just really done in secret. Sorry but this activity alone will raise any suspicion and voters won't stand for it until it is addressed. The left has no intrest in showing how honest things were counted because it wasn't done honestly, prove innocence here please Dems, it should be easy. For the sake of America this needs to be investigated and any citizen of the United States should demand a fair and open election and have access to the counts in a real time timeline with computer reports to prove the real time results. The lack of proper record keeping is also very suspicious because its ripe with FRAUD.
I took a shot at this trying to breakdown the way things transpired on election night from opposite viewpoints - as if massive fraud took place vs mass confirmation bias. It's easier to point you to it instead of trying to type it all out. It starts here: https://discordapp.com/channels/760945067107680286/771201221145919499/784832307219136612
Regarding the appearance of vote spikes in the transmission of aggregated data at Edison Research/NEP to NYT, there are many possible explanations, only one of which is possible fraud. It certainly is not proof of fraud.
It's hard to do all that and maintain the secret vote? But yeah the system is severely flawed.
Yes. The idea of destroying the petrol industry in favor of state run green energy does 3 things:
1. Yields manufacturing and energy production to China, so that we become dependent on them for both
2. Destroys our environment (unintended consequences of wind and solar) and energy capacity (relying on coal backup, like Germany)
3. Nationalizes energy production
A few things people don't know...
50 gallons of oil is equal to 30 years of human work..
It takes 10 years for a solar system to return on investment with a substitute, this means it takes more energy to create the solar power system than you will ever get out of it.
In construction 50 to 75% of the energy used in a building's lifetime is intrinsic, meaning it went into the building materials and the building of the building before the building goes into use.
In the United States every calorie of food consumed has 11 calories of fossil fuel or other energy sources built into the production supply chain.
What replaces oil? Nothing.
That's the currently available technology.
Nuclear power plants arguably take more energy input to create than they do ever output, although this is disputed in the literature.
Can both parties agree that suitcases of ballots brought out after observers were kicked out and then diligently counted ASAP is blatantly suspicious to the point it looks like you are watching crime being committed. Can a Biden supporter chime in here, put yourself in the other shoes, it would be devastating to watch Trump lising then miraculously winning in a state that was landslides for Biden just hours before. Not just unlikely but boldly and unapologetically stolen when your witnesses were given the boot.
One day will alternative so-called green energy sources yelled more energy output than the input, perhaps.
Also know that global oil output as well as natural output have reached peak production years ago.
You can't have a unlimited growth paradigm economy with a finite oil supply. I'm not saying that you can't get oil out of the ground I'm saying it's not profitable in terms of energy input versus output. This is why the money supply has to continually inflate, in order to pay the debt on past energy infrastructure.
All energy in any form is converted forms of sunshine as radiation. Stored as carbon based fuels, decaying matter from life forms, sunshine, and water. You will use all of it over time its like a battery, but you are just converting matter from one form to another, pollution isn't real. Mars Venus Jupiter, etc.. atmospheres are natural to them and poison to humans. We would need to polute thier atmospheres with oxygen so we could survive. Pollution is in the eye of the organism that can't survive in a natural environment.