Message from @AdvanceManExtraordinaire

Discord ID: 786340002590228501


2020-12-09 21:06:58 UTC  

Emotions are highly charged surrounding this 4 yr coup to take down an Amercian president despite who the sitting president may be. I would definitely be as deeply disturbed if it were a 4 yr hiatus, impeachment and election fraud of any president. Couple that with blatant censorship and "authoritarian" news sources and the emotional response to textbook and historical tyrrany elicits a foreboding sense of doom.

2020-12-09 21:07:31 UTC  

'Under penalty of perjury.' That little flourish worked on precisely the people it was intended to impress.

2020-12-09 21:08:00 UTC  

The Term "Fraud" IMO has been wildly over used. Something can be Unlawful and not be the product of Fraud?

2020-12-09 21:08:20 UTC  

It surprises me how many Americans who have zero political opinion regarding this election and who did not vote, who believe this should be investigated to the ends of the earth and back.

2020-12-09 21:08:21 UTC  

Authoritarian news sources? Uh, what?

2020-12-09 21:08:56 UTC  

I think part of the reason was Q

2020-12-09 21:09:13 UTC  

Don’t do anything, trust the plan etc.

2020-12-09 21:09:20 UTC  

I too believe it should be investigated. I also think people making factual claims regarding things about which they know nothing aren't helping the cause.

2020-12-09 21:09:27 UTC  

There have been fewer than 60 elections in US history. I could find any number of supposed statistical outliers that when taken together and out of context would seem to favor either candidate in any contest over every US election. It is just too small a data sample to provide any meaning to those statistical anomalies. Plus, there are a number of factors that are unique to this election. You have a divided electorate that are stuck in opposing media echo chambers.

2020-12-09 21:10:21 UTC  

He got fired for disagreeing with Trump. Nothing less. His employees have been continuing his work.

2020-12-09 21:10:22 UTC  

Hypothetical question for antitrumpers: if 1,000 witnesses testify to the same murder under oath, and the court rules against them, which side do you take?

2020-12-09 21:10:47 UTC  

Spot on. You said it yourself. We only know what’s been presented as evidence to us. We have zero control over the courts but we do have a voice.

2020-12-09 21:10:56 UTC  

So you are a fan of fiction...

2020-12-09 21:10:57 UTC  

Please do.

2020-12-09 21:11:35 UTC  

@AdvanceManExtraordinaire Well if the 1000 witnesses were unable to maintain a semblance of consistency in their testimony, then yes they should be ignored

2020-12-09 21:11:58 UTC  

Nothing like offering analogies that have nothing in common with the point one is trying to make...

2020-12-09 21:12:05 UTC  

Statistical outliers only show the presence of further investigation. The stats themselves only prove an abnormally.

2020-12-09 21:12:29 UTC  

Are you insinuating that these brave whistleblowers are all liars?

2020-12-09 21:12:43 UTC  

It’s just a hypothetical. Is the court, in principle, always right and just?

2020-12-09 21:12:49 UTC  

@TaLoN132 It could very well end up like Rutherford B Hayes, though most likely it will be more of a Grover Cleveland

2020-12-09 21:14:26 UTC  

In the issue of elections , what if they do show a pattern of consistent behavior across several states?

2020-12-09 21:15:17 UTC  

I am stating with near certainty based on an analysis of what is most likely given the circumstances that these people suffer from a form of GroupThink confirmation bias. They were told repeated that fraud would happen, They believed that it would happen. And under this assumption, saw every activity as nefarious and every election worker as suspect. This is borne out by the facts, because under scrutiny this has been proven to be the case 100% of the time so far.

2020-12-09 21:16:37 UTC  

I’m not buying into that. I think their testimonies are far less fictional than that train of thought. Of course that’s my firm opinion.

2020-12-09 21:16:51 UTC  

@AdvanceManExtraordinaire Because they are alleging that the same pattern occurred across the states in question

2020-12-09 21:17:09 UTC  

Or it proves that we have become more polarized than ever - as people believe absolutely what they are told in their chosen echo chamber.

2020-12-09 21:17:37 UTC  

The question is was the Law followed. The motive is really irreverent. Motivation may be a factor in a Criminal Case. This is Civil and about Voting Process and it's outcomes.

2020-12-09 21:17:38 UTC  

Hunter Biden admitted that he's facing a tax fraud investigation.

2020-12-09 21:17:42 UTC  

@TaLoN132 Like with Q

2020-12-09 21:18:29 UTC  

And now E

2020-12-09 21:18:29 UTC  

@Garak, you just advanced to level 2!

2020-12-09 21:18:55 UTC  

Trump won those states by 0.2, 0.7 and 0.8 percentage points, respectively — and by 10,704, 46,765 and 22,177 votes. Those three wins gave him 46 electoral votes; if Clinton had done one point better in each state, she'd have won the electoral vote, too."

2020-12-09 21:19:00 UTC  

Exactly... But on all sides. The so called MSM echo chamber... Leftwing Echo Chamber... Rightwing Echo Chamber.

2020-12-09 21:19:09 UTC  

Conformation Bias is a strong weapon in a Public Relations/Perception Campaign.

2020-12-09 21:19:11 UTC  

Who the hell is E?

2020-12-09 21:19:11 UTC  

Yeah the internet bubble via algorithms meant to make life easier has really messed with people

2020-12-09 21:19:24 UTC  

QE

2020-12-09 21:19:44 UTC  

AKA quantitative easing

2020-12-09 21:19:49 UTC  

Trump won because..79,646 voted. For him

2020-12-09 21:20:03 UTC  

What happened to making sure that all legally cast ballots are counted?

2020-12-09 21:20:23 UTC  

Is this confirmation bias?

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/771201221145919499/786341499973533736/image0.jpg

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/771201221145919499/786341500165685299/image1.jpg