One valid one.

What’s even happening?

How will you know is valid?

It will be vetted in a court of law, the mechanism we have for plausible grievances.

Ah right, the courts are infallible.

I mean that’s a fair argument

Man, I guess all those police shootings of unarmed black folk were 100% justified?

Seeing as they all got vetted in a court of law

@AdvanceManExtraordinaire No, your judgement will suffice for me. Let me know what I think when you get a chance.

Have they taken down your 2020 election show?

I think it’s important to be conscious of how you structure your beliefs. If it really all came down to what the courts decide, that’s problematic.

How about gathering a herd of hysterical fanatics doesn't convince me, as impressive as that is to some people.

Fine, but there needs to be a middle ground between "shown in court" and "hearsey" that you'll believe these accusations.

If it really all JUST came down to witness testimony, that’s problematic as well. I’m sure Biden could find a few thousand people willing to lie under oath to oust trump.

So what you're saying is a summary judgment by the mob with punishment meted out on the spot.

My understanding is that, if they signed affidavits, it would be the gospel, yes.

A must watch Dan Bongino show today..before, thank decides to take it down..very informative.

@JV justice for victims, you just advanced to level 1!

Hallelujah

What does level one mean?

Witness testimony of illegal process must coincide with mathematical and numerical data, and must coincide with testimony of process in other states to show a pattern

Forget them. You said your belief standard was "It will be vetted in a court of law".

That's a ridiculous standard for belief.

It means you have entered security concern 1 on the watch list. Did you get a message?

Oh..you're a bot..must be a warning.

Thank you Zuluzeit!

> Forget them. You said your belief standard was "It will be vetted in a court of law".
>
> That's a ridiculous standard for belief.
@DrSammyD That's just to get me to take it seriously. I'll listen then.

You must be a bot if there are perceived ideological differences.

So again, you believe that all those Police Shootings of unarmed black folk should be dismissed. The courts threw them out.

No it said Bot right before

Maybe. I haven't bothered to hear them all.

Was it a ranking from the engagement pot

You are assuming they all went to Court?

You bring the proof and I'll decide whether I'm convinced. Pretty please.

I don't know busillis

That's what it was

The more blathering an avatar does the more ranking the Avatar gets

That's a general commentary nothing directed at you

The mental gymnastics needed to try to fit Trump's narrative requires Olympic level effort... especially when the simplest, most plausible explanation is that after months of being told there would be fraud, Trump's supporters were influenced to the point of confirmation bias and are reporting things they thought they saw under the assumption that fraud was taking place.

So what does it mean?busillis?

The more content you post the higher your ranking becomes.

It's a measure of how many characters you post.