Message from @Dedkraken
Discord ID: 786741172524548137
Not without the House...
So you advocate for corrupt politicians?
Kayleigh McAcrazy wants everyone to know the odds of Biden winning were 1 in 1000000000000000 ^ 4 and she cannot understand why the media won't cover her totally really facts brought to court.
Eh, I give you a A- on pragmatism. R&R is the closest thing to an unbiased source of commentary I’ve found. MSM (Fox included) is a dying news medium that needs to write striking headlines without alienating their viewership or investors, so no real reporting can happen.
Without news agencies / journalists doing the legwork if falls on independent journalists and then if falls on you the reader to find a second source confirming. That’s why I don’t think the dots will be connected until we are pretty far out from here.
The group think would be wild because Trump would have out swamped the swamp. 🤔
And on the other hand IF there is fraud and IF it can be proved, changes will need to be made and that’s good. Really good for America.
Not at all... If you are saying that partisan-based retaliatory impeachment hearings are to be expected, then it requires control of the House. I would hope that for any high-crimes and misdemeanors that can be proven, that it would be supported by both parties.
I'll take it... Thanks.
Hunter's a good guy I'm sure that nothing will come of his troubles with the government.
Good thing he's not president.
He would make a fine president.
Or attorney general
This is 2020... Anything is possible.
Fortunately, Joe probably has more sense than that.
I certainly hope he doesn't have better sense.
This is entertainment palladium.
I mean theres some bias like the Mellissa Carone testimony was unhinged but they cut some reasonable clips 😂
But he doesnt dismiss the other side which is nice.
Fraud doesn’t have to be widespread to change the election results. Concentrated fraud, in one county, affecting less than a percent of a vote, is not widespread, yet can swing an election. The term “widespread fraud” was carefully chosen by corporate media for this reason.
Let's start with finding fraud then move on to finding enough to flip a state then all the required states. That seems to fit widespread. Still waiting on intial.
Say 10,000 people voted by mail from addresses that don’t exist. Does that qualify as fraud?
How do you vote from an address that doesn't exist??? They literally have to send the ballot to a valid address. How can you receive a ballot to fill out if they can't send it to you?
Sure if they dig into it and find 10k legit cases. Usually these cursory "we believe 10k errors" pan out pretty small with followup
@Dedkraken, you just advanced to level 26!
FOX 31 Denver: Northern Lights might be seen in Colorado Thursday; Communication could be impacted by Geomagnetic Storm.
https://kdvr.com/news/local/northern-lights-might-be-seen-in-colorado-thursday-communication-could-be-impacted-by-geomagnetic-storm/
Incoming
I agree.
You add votes and use the fake address.
R n r not streaming today?
I’m wondering the same
No, he’s not streaming today or tomorrow
That would be easy to prove... Can't wait to see the evidence.
It speaks to foreknowledge.
People were talking about the Hunter Biden laptop stuff earlier:
https://nypost.com/2020/12/10/greenwald-posts-hunter-biden-reports-suppressed-by-media/
Anything more than a handful could be considered widespread.
This is also true. We are only talking about four states really. So, widespread doesn’t really have to be that widespread.
What does it take to meet the massive threshold?
If it flipped one state that’s pretty massive.