@james j Not evidence but highly suspicious.

The neutral position is that there is no widespread fraud. We have never had to prove a election non fraudulent. This only come from conservatives this year because they lost and are grasping at straws @GregInHouston2

@james j Unless you are highly biased.

@GregInHouston2 not only is it not suspicious, it’s was expected

> lol. is that so? Minority , by definition, is less than
@Tneedels Ok. Every person is a minority. Make your point kinda trite, no?

@james j We have never had fraud on such a massive scale!

Correct. We haven't.

Good Day, and God Bless. :)\

Mass self-fulfilling prophecy.

Glad you came around.

We knew mail ins would be counted after the polling places close as per law. There is nothing suspicious of only uploading Biden votes in a batch. We don’t have massive fraud . This is just the conservative fantasy. Which trump exploits by taking 200 million dollars from his supporters to pocket @GregInHouston2

@james j Keep it simple. One thing at a time.

@busillis the red mirage was predicted as the law demands you can’t count mail ins until after the polls close

@GregInHouston2 there was no massive fraud

@james j Then let us prove it!

you cant prove something did not happen....

how would I prove I did not murder anyone???

@james j You won't because you know it happened and you don't want it proven.

@james j you can look at it from either way group think... And thanks I was trying to bolster your point...

Trump own lawyers don’t even present fraud cases in court @GregInHouston2 they know they don’t have anything. @GregInHouston2

What's up@Doc

?

"Your honor, I have no arms. I had them removed in 1972. Therefore I can not murder".

@busillis slow day. u?

@james j They haven't been allowed to. No standing and laches is

@Doc With an alibi.

Wasting time at the place you found me last?@Doc

@Navarro That would be one specific murder. Not murder in general.

Requiring proof of absence of existence has had fun consequences in other areas as well.

@GregInHouston#3736 they have done a million recounts and audits that refute all the huckster testimonies in the hotel lobbies. Mellisa carone was presented to the court and was found to be non credible. They have looked at this “evidence” it’s just hearsay within hearsay

Doc is a witch, btw.

And the Flying Spaghetti Monster is displeased with fraud talk.

@james j There was an audit in AZ. An audit was promised in GA but not done. None in PA or MI. Recounting 200,000 fraudulent votes is not meaningful!

@GregInHouston2 they don’t present fraud cases in court. How can you complain about not being heard when you don’t bring up fraud. The few times they tried they brought forth such weak evidence it was thrown out of court.

@james j you can't say there's no precedent set for evidence-free persecutions, think about the people who have been exonerated with DNA evidence.

@GregInHouston2 do you know what a audit is?

@Navarro If you accuse me of one specific act, at one specific time, I can prove my innocence by proving I could not have acted as pr your description. If you, however, accuse me of having "at a time and place unknown to the prosecutor" committed a murder, I will have a hard time proving anything.

Agreed.

The did two full recounts in GA. That’s above and beyond a audit @GregInHouston2

@james j Fraud was brought up every time. Dismissed on standing or laches doesn't allow for evidence.

Nope