That they started and didn’t finish

@AOH_Assassin https://www.governor.pa.gov/newsroom/governor-wolf-signs-election-reform-bill-including-new-mail-in-voting/

first president from outside of politics and a billionaire that cant be bought and paid for, thats who i voted for over the 50yr corrupt flip flopping politician that had open brain surgery

That judge ruled in favor, and accepted the on the basis that it would "likely win"

@james j They lost under a provision that does not apply to persons that are enemies of the nation.

@AOH_Assassin do you accept the official pa site?

then the pennsylvania supreme court stepped in, took it from her, and dismissed because of latches

Act 77 was a statute. It was never an amendment.

@james j It is an illegal and unconstitutional law.

https://peoplepill.com/people/michael-farris/

They lost under the bill of which they filed, making it a technical not marital

Act 77 doesn't have shit on

The Pennsylvania Constitution

Check out the Nevada case, if you are so sure.

And not even close to the Amendments

The party’s affiliation with regard to the law passed does not invalidate arguments about constitutionality

And if you truly believe that an act passed a year ago touches teh Constitution, you're worse than i thought

@Whithers no it’s a law the PA gop started and never finished. That’s why it’s unconstitutional under state law. However the remedy the asked for was ridiculous. And they lost to laches. Because they had a year to address it and had a election under the GOP rules

Is there a list of the cases somewhere along with some analysis of what occurred in the cases?

@Whithers Im not starting anything. Sorry. I am looking for a person to explain to me why they voted FOR someone, as opposed to voting for the lesser of two evils. I think we can conclude I still have not found such a person.

I have watched it all. Read the dockets, Researched what I didn't know. Watched this guy's interpretation. Asked a relative who is a federal attorney. And read some more.

You’re attacking people’s credentials because you don’t have a response

All i'm saying, do yourself a favor, a research what you're speaking

@AOH_Assassin it’s important Becuase it’s trumps party making the claim. They caused it then complained about it when their guy lost. They had a year to fix it

i repeat... first president from outside of politics and a billionaire that cant be bought and paid for, thats who i voted for over the 50yr corrupt flip flopping politician that had open brain surgery

You want to hold the remedy ridiculous because you want the USA to be suborned under China.

@Ghostdog exactly!

fearless, arrogant, human, not a puppter

I'm right here @Doc I voted for a third party candidate who I think would make an excellent president but had no chance in you know where of getting elected.

@Whithers no I’m not worried about China

@meglide right. I dont know that candidate.

@james j I thought you were lefty?

@james j Of course you are not, China is who you wish to have rule over US.

China should scare you to death.

IDK they're taking shit over quickly, and strategically, because they were allowed to learn our shit at faults of biden, obama, and biden

@Tneedels, you just advanced to level 5!

The Republicans used Act 77 as a basis for opposing the temporary changes the SotC Boockvar implemented. They never once asserted that it was unconstitutional in the run-up to the election. Quite the opposite. It was only after Trump lost that they tried to claim it was unconstitutional. Both cases were allowed to stand - a 4-4 tie pre-election and unanimously without dissent by a 6-3 majority Conservative Court.

Because she had no chance. I'm a dreamer I guess about to refuse to vote for the lesser of two evils.

@meglide I understand that much better.

It makes sense.

Not to mention, when I was a kid, my father told me that China had a large enough army that they could march it into the ocean 1 mile wide, and NEVER run out. Literally.