@james j But fraud tho. Js.

Which case did not have due process . This is you claim you have not seen it. In which case have you not seen due process not occur @rip.lul

I havent seen a case. at all .

Texas vs the other contested states

you are asking me to provide a case, that i have not seeen.

"standing"

https://discordapp.com/channels/760945067107680286/771201221145919499/793539097930891323

So why are you claiming to have not seen due process if you haven’t even looked at the court cases . You claim is that “courts have not looked at the evidence” which court case did not look at the evidence. You have about 60 to choose from @rip.lul

I digress

Do you understand what a positive claim is @rip.lul

enlighten me?

you got me bro. 1 you 0 me. No election fraud.

Its settled then \

lol

“Courts have not looked at the evidence” this is a positive claim of something the court did (the action being not looking at the evidence) . How are you justifying this positive claim @rip.lul

Im not. I retract my statement.

What court case meets this criteria of not looking at fraud evidence @rip.lul

Good

you got me.

So tomorrow will you continue to think that fraud evidence was not looked at by the courts @rip.lul

because they explained "standing" on this show

Or that the evidence of fraud was not looked at by the courts

I will still not have seen total due process.

@chuchomucho standing had to do with the Texas case which was about state procedures not fraud

@rip.lul ok name one where due process was not granted

That is fruad

No it isn’t @chuchomucho

That not voter or election fraud @chuchomucho

i HAVENT SEEEN IT

they changed the rules illegally

THERE IS NOTHING TO NAME

Same principle apples. Which court case did not give the plaintiff due process @rip.lul the positive claims being “courts did not give due process”

Maybe you could provide an instance of this and not some Op-ed saying no evidence,

I am only going by the court cases

can you provide me some?

and not an op-ed article.

Of the court cases which one did not give the plaintiff due process: I’m not doing your homework. You made the positive claims now support it @rip.lul

they changed the rules illegally, they did not go through the correct process of changing them

That is fruad

My claim; I have not seen nonpartisan due process. Its potentially out there. I just havent seen it.

@james j You could also just say 'no evidence'. That's how making claims works, as is my understanding.