Message from @Zuluzeit
Discord ID: 793541374661099530
And mass political executions
> See what I did there.? I wasnt a dick.
@rip.lul Correct. We have that in common.
No. we dont.
So, you're calling me a dick?
Just playing. I don't care what you call me.
Ill answer that how you answered my question about Biden policies. I wont.
Like, super duper don't care. For real.
lol
I havent seen a court case with legit due process. Thats my point..
Long live Dear Leader Biden
You keep circling back to a vague comment I made.
@SoonMrWick go look at the actual numbers and not incompetent republicans who are so far 0 out of a million on bogus claims
But muh fraud
@rip.lul name one where you think due process has not been given. Also now you are moving the goal post away from fraud cases. Remember the goal of Trump and the republicans is to prove fraud actually happened and have actual evidence. I want to know in what case where they brought forth evidence of fraud the evidence was not seen
I JUST SAID I HAVENT SEEN ANY - THAT MEANS I CANNOT NAME 1
They changed the rules in all the contested states without making it into law
Which case did not have due process . This is you claim you have not seen it. In which case have you not seen due process not occur @rip.lul
I havent seen a case. at all .
Texas vs the other contested states
you are asking me to provide a case, that i have not seeen.
"standing"
So why are you claiming to have not seen due process if you haven’t even looked at the court cases . You claim is that “courts have not looked at the evidence” which court case did not look at the evidence. You have about 60 to choose from @rip.lul
I digress
enlighten me?
you got me bro. 1 you 0 me. No election fraud.
Its settled then \
lol
“Courts have not looked at the evidence” this is a positive claim of something the court did (the action being not looking at the evidence) . How are you justifying this positive claim @rip.lul
Im not. I retract my statement.
What court case meets this criteria of not looking at fraud evidence @rip.lul
Good
you got me.
So tomorrow will you continue to think that fraud evidence was not looked at by the courts @rip.lul
because they explained "standing" on this show