You keep circling back to a vague comment I made.

@SoonMrWick go look at the actual numbers and not incompetent republicans who are so far 0 out of a million on bogus claims

But muh fraud

@rip.lul name one where you think due process has not been given. Also now you are moving the goal post away from fraud cases. Remember the goal of Trump and the republicans is to prove fraud actually happened and have actual evidence. I want to know in what case where they brought forth evidence of fraud the evidence was not seen

I JUST SAID I HAVENT SEEN ANY - THAT MEANS I CANNOT NAME 1

They changed the rules in all the contested states without making it into law

@james j But fraud tho. Js.

Which case did not have due process . This is you claim you have not seen it. In which case have you not seen due process not occur @rip.lul

I havent seen a case. at all .

Texas vs the other contested states

you are asking me to provide a case, that i have not seeen.

"standing"

https://discordapp.com/channels/760945067107680286/771201221145919499/793539097930891323

So why are you claiming to have not seen due process if you haven’t even looked at the court cases . You claim is that “courts have not looked at the evidence” which court case did not look at the evidence. You have about 60 to choose from @rip.lul

I digress

Do you understand what a positive claim is @rip.lul

enlighten me?

you got me bro. 1 you 0 me. No election fraud.

Its settled then \

lol

“Courts have not looked at the evidence” this is a positive claim of something the court did (the action being not looking at the evidence) . How are you justifying this positive claim @rip.lul

Im not. I retract my statement.

What court case meets this criteria of not looking at fraud evidence @rip.lul

Good

you got me.

So tomorrow will you continue to think that fraud evidence was not looked at by the courts @rip.lul

because they explained "standing" on this show

Or that the evidence of fraud was not looked at by the courts

I will still not have seen total due process.

@chuchomucho standing had to do with the Texas case which was about state procedures not fraud

@rip.lul ok name one where due process was not granted

That is fruad

No it isn’t @chuchomucho

That not voter or election fraud @chuchomucho

i HAVENT SEEEN IT

they changed the rules illegally

THERE IS NOTHING TO NAME

Same principle apples. Which court case did not give the plaintiff due process @rip.lul the positive claims being “courts did not give due process”

Maybe you could provide an instance of this and not some Op-ed saying no evidence,