Message from @james j
Discord ID: 793909659576696843
theres never going to be proof for leftists, they are blind as hell
Ok. Affidavits are not enough. The Navarro Report is not enough. How about a press release from the Director of National Intelligence saying that voter registration info was obtained by Iran and Russia in October? https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/press-releases/item/2162-dni-john-ratcliffe-s-remarks-at-press-conference-on-election-security
You just want there to be fraud @chuchomucho
Ah, but have you considered cuz 'The Left'?
Did u not read what i said "So, this is what happened, the DNC sued to change the rules last minute and did not do it through the right channel where it would have included a vote from the people. This helped them bypass the legislator and people. Then some people where fed misinformation to diminish the validity of the actual fraud, to make us argue over this crap. You can say it wasn’t fraud but it led to a large opportunity of fraud, that probably did happen. I don’t think they will ever admit to it as they will get sued, they are just going to sweep everything under the rug."
You mean there is nothing that can convince a trump supporters there wasn’t fraud even though they can’t prove it @Ghostdog
theres so much fraud its not even funny, on its face there was illegal voting and fraud in many states, you just dont like it
@chuchomucho that is a not fraud. That is the changing of rules. That does not make the votes themselves fraudulent votes cast by people in good faith
@Livingstone My understanding is that Russia does not interfere in our elections. I'm confused now.
Yea they will believe anything
the machines themselves are a fraud on their face, foreigners involved in our elections, and huge amounts of money exchanged, most ppl care
U can’t change the rules in an illegal manner and say it’s not fraud
No
If we are naming things in order of importance they put Iran first.
@chuchomucho that’s a internal state issue. That is not fraud it self. Also they lost those cases in their own Supreme Court that interprets their state constitution
“With that in mind, we would like to alert the public that we have identified that two foreign actors – Iran and Russia – have taken specific actions to influence public opinion relating to our elections.” Source-https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/press-releases/item/2162-dni-john-ratcliffe-s-remarks-at-press-conference-on-election-security
So it makes it ok then. to diminish my vote?
everyone knows who loves America, and who hates her, the democrats are being outed as globalists and corporate whores bigtime
It doesn’t diminish your vote. It’s let’s old people and people who take the pandemic seriously to actually vote @chuchomucho there was no election fraud
@james j Anything contributing to Trump's loss goes in the 'fraud' bucket. For instance, if you voted for Biden, that's fraud. Catch up.
It’s helpful to agree to definition at the onset of a discussion to prevent people from moving the goal post, so to speak
the nomination itself was stolen from Bernie, the zombies just want to win more than be honest
The issue with unrequested mail in ballots is that people were having to sign affidavits requesting that their mail in ballot be canceled because they did not request it and it had already been sent and people are finding out that they had voted when they went in to vote. If somebody sent a mail in ballot in your name That was not you and then you tried to vote and were told that you had already voted, Does that not diminish your vote?
Although I must say it's easier participating with having the benefit of reality comporting with my position.
As the rest of the world moves on, indifferent to fringe conspiracies.
the left now loves corporations run by billionaire scumbags, that are blatantly globalists and hate America, especially her bill of rights
It wasn't fraud and it did not bypass the legislature. The legislature empowered the SoS or SotC (in the case of PA) or the Election Board (in GA) with the ability to make decisions to ensure the safe execution of the election. The changes that were made were largely temporary given the circumstances. The state SC upheld that these entities were empowered to make these changes and in the case of PA, the US SC allowed them to stand.
It is interesting to note that other states did similar things. In Texas, the Governor extending the date for in person early voting (without involving the legislature) and went out of his way to limit mail-in voting. https://www.texastribune.org/2020/10/07/texas-early-voting-october-13/
Also, it is interesting to note that Texas was extremely adept at suppressing the vote. TX and FL both had about 11M ballots cast in the election - TX has 7.5M more residents than FL.
Ok so now we have all the power that was designed to keep anyone entity from getting full control to change rules they seem fit?
these evil democrats are after our bill of rights now, the 1st, 2nd, 4th Amendments..
Obey
Radical republicans are tight.
That's not accurate, either... The SC had to have grounds for allowing the changes... in this case, the pandemic. Also, they have 4 years to make any changes that they want in either limiting or removing that power. It's kind of how democracy is supposed to work.
> these evil democrats are after our bill of rights now, the 1st, 2nd, 4th Amendments..
@Ghostdog *evil republicans are tight
@SuzyQ, you just advanced to level 1!
ok so they will use another pandemic to change rules and take away rigfhts and thats ok with u?
leftists hate our rights and freedoms, the 1st,2nd,4th Amendments.. sicko America hating globalist minions
@chuchomucho Hard to say. My preferences depend on how butthurt I am about the outcome.