That would be appropriate if that happened like... 8 weeks ago. Instead, Biden has indulged Trump the entire time. And unlike now, there was actual proof of Russian involvement that was confirmed by Trump himself. He just denied colluding with them. Otherwise, why would he have signed the EO about foreign involvement and started CISA?

they spied on a president, and tried to impeach over false charges, even calling to remove him outright, they would never do election fraud lol

It was filed on the 14 th of December . These rules were changed months before @Livingstone

We'll see... It would take both chambers voting to uphold the objection. Somehow, I don't see the House doing that.

Senator was the harder one. Tooblin said he would then backtracked. Now Hawley just comfirmed this morning

There are many house members

actually it is turning out to be the same thing just with the parties reversed ... huge investigation into Russian interference in 2016 election, little evidence that such was the case and/or that interference changed the vote ... huge investigation into supposed fraud in 2020 election, little evidence that such is the case and/or that fraud changed the vote

The impeachment was petty, but the facts are not in dispute. He threatened to withhold aid in exchange for dirt on his political opponent.

these sicko democrats have tried blaming a pandemic let loose by China throughout the world on the president, its disgusting

Oral arguments on September 29, 2020. Oral arguments are only received after both sides have filed briefs.

No

-160C. That is so wild.

@Livingstone yeah that was brought up in March initially and had their primaries under that rule. They the lost case.

That’s not proof of fraud , that’s still just a attack on the election process it self with no regard for people dealing with the pandemic @Livingstone

To be fair, it didn't go their way. Therefore fraud.

I want to see actual proof of fraud @Livingstone

In court

Will a thousand more hysterical fanatics swearing something seems fishy convince you?

the haters of America and democracy and rule of law have been outed , the establishment govt and media and many corporations are all against the ppl now

There’s the caveat.

It’s the only caveat that matters when it comes to fact finding

Hotel rumor/gossip hearings don’t cut it

Fact-Check: False.

Sham hearings are tight.

It’s great for entertainment

*'hearings'

So, this is what happened, the DNC sued to change the rules last minute and did not do it through the right channel where it would have included a vote from the people. This helped them bypass the legislator and people. Then some people where fed misinformation to diminish the validity of the actual fraud, to make us argue over this crap. You can say it wasn’t fraud but it led to a large opportunity of fraud, that probably did happen. I don’t think they will ever admit to it as they will get sued, they are just going to sweep everything under the rug.

This is my favorite mellisa carone videos. At 21 seconds https://youtu.be/NfB4wba04xg

I witnessed 0 voter fraud and will absolutely testify to that under penalty of perjury.

ppl that werent elected illegally changed voting rules outside the law in Wisconsin, its fraud and illegal on its face lol

Checkmate, jurisprudence.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, there have been numerous instances of the government protecting itself and defending its legitimacy at the expense of disclosing truth, so to say only what is rule by the court is true is false.

@chuchomucho there was a pandemic

That’s not fraud or proof of actual voter fraud

Election fraud

theres never going to be proof for leftists, they are blind as hell

Ok. Affidavits are not enough. The Navarro Report is not enough. How about a press release from the Director of National Intelligence saying that voter registration info was obtained by Iran and Russia in October? https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/press-releases/item/2162-dni-john-ratcliffe-s-remarks-at-press-conference-on-election-security

You just want there to be fraud @chuchomucho

Ah, but have you considered cuz 'The Left'?

Did u not read what i said "So, this is what happened, the DNC sued to change the rules last minute and did not do it through the right channel where it would have included a vote from the people. This helped them bypass the legislator and people. Then some people where fed misinformation to diminish the validity of the actual fraud, to make us argue over this crap. You can say it wasn’t fraud but it led to a large opportunity of fraud, that probably did happen. I don’t think they will ever admit to it as they will get sued, they are just going to sweep everything under the rug."

You mean there is nothing that can convince a trump supporters there wasn’t fraud even though they can’t prove it @Ghostdog

theres so much fraud its not even funny, on its face there was illegal voting and fraud in many states, you just dont like it