Message from @Zuluzeit
Discord ID: 793908274717392946
No
-160C. That is so wild.
@Livingstone yeah that was brought up in March initially and had their primaries under that rule. They the lost case.
That’s not proof of fraud , that’s still just a attack on the election process it self with no regard for people dealing with the pandemic @Livingstone
To be fair, it didn't go their way. Therefore fraud.
I want to see actual proof of fraud @Livingstone
In court
Will a thousand more hysterical fanatics swearing something seems fishy convince you?
the haters of America and democracy and rule of law have been outed , the establishment govt and media and many corporations are all against the ppl now
There’s the caveat.
It’s the only caveat that matters when it comes to fact finding
Hotel rumor/gossip hearings don’t cut it
Fact-Check: False.
Sham hearings are tight.
It’s great for entertainment
*'hearings'
So, this is what happened, the DNC sued to change the rules last minute and did not do it through the right channel where it would have included a vote from the people. This helped them bypass the legislator and people. Then some people where fed misinformation to diminish the validity of the actual fraud, to make us argue over this crap. You can say it wasn’t fraud but it led to a large opportunity of fraud, that probably did happen. I don’t think they will ever admit to it as they will get sued, they are just going to sweep everything under the rug.
This is my favorite mellisa carone videos. At 21 seconds https://youtu.be/NfB4wba04xg
I witnessed 0 voter fraud and will absolutely testify to that under penalty of perjury.
ppl that werent elected illegally changed voting rules outside the law in Wisconsin, its fraud and illegal on its face lol
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, there have been numerous instances of the government protecting itself and defending its legitimacy at the expense of disclosing truth, so to say only what is rule by the court is true is false.
@chuchomucho there was a pandemic
That’s not fraud or proof of actual voter fraud
Election fraud
theres never going to be proof for leftists, they are blind as hell
Ok. Affidavits are not enough. The Navarro Report is not enough. How about a press release from the Director of National Intelligence saying that voter registration info was obtained by Iran and Russia in October? https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/press-releases/item/2162-dni-john-ratcliffe-s-remarks-at-press-conference-on-election-security
You just want there to be fraud @chuchomucho
Ah, but have you considered cuz 'The Left'?
Did u not read what i said "So, this is what happened, the DNC sued to change the rules last minute and did not do it through the right channel where it would have included a vote from the people. This helped them bypass the legislator and people. Then some people where fed misinformation to diminish the validity of the actual fraud, to make us argue over this crap. You can say it wasn’t fraud but it led to a large opportunity of fraud, that probably did happen. I don’t think they will ever admit to it as they will get sued, they are just going to sweep everything under the rug."
You mean there is nothing that can convince a trump supporters there wasn’t fraud even though they can’t prove it @Ghostdog
theres so much fraud its not even funny, on its face there was illegal voting and fraud in many states, you just dont like it
@chuchomucho that is a not fraud. That is the changing of rules. That does not make the votes themselves fraudulent votes cast by people in good faith
@Livingstone My understanding is that Russia does not interfere in our elections. I'm confused now.
Yea they will believe anything
the machines themselves are a fraud on their face, foreigners involved in our elections, and huge amounts of money exchanged, most ppl care
U can’t change the rules in an illegal manner and say it’s not fraud
No
If we are naming things in order of importance they put Iran first.
@chuchomucho that’s a internal state issue. That is not fraud it self. Also they lost those cases in their own Supreme Court that interprets their state constitution