Message from @Livingstone
Discord ID: 793917848576589844
Hyper + Confused is a good recipe for crazy, sure.
I live in CA and we send mail-in ballots to all registered voters. It went really well. I and everyone in my family received only 1 ballot. If we chose to vote in person, we were able to surrender the mail-in ballot at our local polling site. I was notified by text/email when the ballot was sent to me and I was notified when my ballot was received and would have been notified if it required any curing.
In many ways, it is more secure than what is done in states that require that a voter request their mail-in ballot. For example, in GA, people were able to specify where their ballot is sent when they request the mail-in ballot. In CA, ballots are sent to the address on record. If the person is not at that address, the Post Office is supposed to return the ballot and not forward it.
> leftists hate our rights and freedoms, the 1st,2nd,4th Amendments.. sicko America hating globalist minions
@Ghostdog for posterity
Good points. People in Georgia are just, well you know Georgia.
What rights were taken away??? To date, the only thing that has been proven is that more legal votes were cast. Show me the scores of illegal ballots and the people who are being arrested for fraud.
Has CA done mail in ballots prior to 2020 or is it new for them as well? I don’t doubt what you are saying. I am just curious to see if in states where the laws were changed this year have a significant difference/dispute/issues than states that have done mail in ballots in the past.
@meglide I will savor every second of revisionist squirming in all future elections.
The first time was with the Primaries this year.
don't think even Trump is convinced:
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-hated-melania-mar-a-lago-redecoration-tear-out-cnn-2020-12
so Trump could have won CA ... in a bigly landslide
Looks like I won't get to see the headline I predicted. 'Trump Barricades Self in White House. Fate Unknown.'
Lmao bigly
Could have, but strangely... most of the gains Dems made in 2018 reverted back to Reps. So, there's that.
That's too confusing. Pass.
Then they did well. That is a ton of people and it’s a good thing that they were successful. I’m glad they caught their error where they forgot a portion to vote for the president! https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-10-06/presidential-candidates-left-off-about-2-100-l-a-county-absentee-ballots
This is what I find interesting: "Biden's national popular vote margin, that 7 million-vote edge, comes from just two states: California and New York."
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/meet-the-press/did-biden-win-little-or-lot-answer-yes-n1251845
Strangely enough... LA County is the only jurisdiction in the country that used a voting system that was developed by Smartmatic. Smartmatic was hired to do a custom system for LA and LA retained the rights and the source code to the system.
@Livingstone another Trump lackie , also the same thing happened in 2016 with Russia. You keep trying to tie multiple different claims together as if they are tied to each other. I’m talking about the lady that didn’t sign a affidavit that was verifiable . Meaning she lied.
That is really cool. I saw the LA had like a 1% rejection rate. They had to toss like 100,000 ballots because they were not filled out properly. Do you know what other systems were used in other counties? It was really smart to retain the rights and the source code. That is Silicon Valley and action! Normally I am not one for big tech, but that was a very smart move. 
We really don't really need to disparage each other.
@Livingstone there are at least 7 states in the union that have been using mail in ballots almost exclusively for decades . They have found a total 0.0025 instances of fraud using the system
I’m sorry James. But I don’t really know what you’re talking about. The last three things that I have posted to you were reports from the DNI. I Haven’t mentioned affidavits since you and I were disputing the file/oral argument date for Wisconsin. You lost me, bro.
Ok... It wasn't a reply, so it looked bad.
@TaLoN132 so here you go, somebody does some half-baked analysis that supposedly shows election fraud, the President picks this story up, Tweets about it, his supporters pick up on it, and then when the Associated Press does a fact check on it, they consider it fake news because the AP is bias and so the echo chamber continues ... rinse and repeat ...
https://www.pennlive.com/elections/2020/12/there-were-not-more-votes-than-voters-in-pa-ap-fact-check.html
Yes you keep pointing to Trump appointed people as evidence of election fraud. What you posted about the DNI was also true in 2016. So what @Livingstone
@Livingstone you pointed to a procedural case not a fraud case
You pointed to a chart that assumes things that are not true made by something a 4 th grader would make @Livingstone
Florida is one. They were great on election night. Finished counting on November 4 and was called around 12:30 because 96% of the expected votes were arrived and counted. That should be congratulated.
Yeah because they did away with the Republican rule of having to wait to count mail ins until after the close of polls. Other states did not adopt this rule hence the red mirage @Livingstone
Ok. Are you really calling the chart from the Navarro report something that a court grader could do?
Yes look at it. It takes data that isn’t real, it uses a check mark system that could be used for any election, it is trash . @Livingstone
I have come to the conclusion that the biggest threats to American democracy are the divisive echo chambers. We are doomed if we don't figure out a way to collectively break out of them. There are some that are trying, but they strangely remain partisan and seem at times more interested in creating their own echo chambers - i.e. TYT and the Lincoln Project.
This guys has been wrong about every single economic prediction since he has been on trumps team @Livingstone
@meglide That's the thing. All someone has to do is say it out loud and it's put on a level playing field of validity. It's absorbed faster than it can be questioned and you can never take it back.
Ok. If it was true in 2016 and we went through the Mueller investigation and the impeachment process then should we not have an investigation since it’s the same thing as 2016?
FL was allowed to start counting mail-in ballots the day before the election. Not just process them, but to start actually counting them.
@Livingstone again for the millionth time. That has nothing to do with the election process it self. You know the voting and the election actually being fraudulent. That had to do with influence of the election . Same as now
Why people can’t see this distinction I will never know