But you could just look at the docs themselves they cite.

You seem to fail to understand that evidence takes time to review. You seem to think that these singular judges are reviewing all this evidence? No. What they are doing is releasing statements and saying that the evidence has no grounds, no merit, blah blah blah... It's very easy to see. These kinds of cases take years, not days or weeks. These judges threw this stuff out without looking at it. It's that plain and simple.

They take years primarily because of formalities and red tape.

Formalities like peer review?

Formalities like deadlines.

Giving people time to respond, etc.

The judges are allowing the cases to be expedited. You still need to produce evidence and legal arguments

Give people time to present their evidence for peer review?

Or just throw it out?

Where was the evidence provided? Where and when?

I'm explaining why cases take years.

I understand what you are explaining.

https://www.newsweek.com/pro-trump-lawyer-lin-wood-said-he-might-actually-second-coming-christ-lawsuit-1558400

Ugh Lin Wood.

@meglide Happy New Year

_insert expletive._

What's to stop the Trump team to pull up in an 18 wheeler at the different polling locations and demand that the truckload of ballots be counted? Fight fire with fire

Kraken "experts" were produced in those cases. Courts found them to be not experts and/or commiting obvious perjury. Many of the "star witnesses" have been presented places like when Judge Kenny reviews Carone's testimony and found her with no knowledge on the process and lying and not squaring with hundreds of other people there. Cases like in AZ let them do their full lineup of witnesses and found nothing there. Michigan they brought in tech testimony vs dominion and failed. Georgia as well.

Lin wood is a National Treasure.

The media hype is all that they are after. You guys have clearly learned nothing from how Trump won last time...

@Mox, you just advanced to level 3!

You're making a pretty broad assumption here when you say 'you guys'.

nobody voted for HilaRY?

They asked to prove the "potential" fraud like double voters or dead voters and they could not. They asked to prove ballot stuffing and they could not. They asked how Georgia beat the paper recount and they could not explain it.

seems Trump forgot how he won also

I think people are smart enough to know who I am addressing. If its broad for you, then maybe its for you 😄

Trump won by stealing a bunch of facebook data and manipulating persuadable folks 😄

Weird logic, but okay.

let's face it, nobody liked Hilary.

Hillary and Trump were both trainwrecks waiting to happen

Hillary was 20x worse than Biden, hands down.

If it works it works. Does the shoe fit?

I won't believe it till there's a signature audit and address check on that envelope

Hillary was on a different level of horrible even before the FBI investigation she was lying about was revealed

wait has been over for a while now

Haha, even when present for the conversation? Fascinating. Lets hope we put you in charge of absolutely nothing.

Biden is a big do-nothing though in a lame duck presidency.

(Fortunately, because Kamala having the reigns without lame duckery would be awful)

That one was a classic

To be honest, I think it's one of the better outcomes for America at the moment. I am glad the Republicans hold the senate, as much as I dislike Mitch.

you're only virtually present ... does present another interesting way to vote that I thought of ... what about virtual in person voting? zoom call with election officials to present yourself and ID and then they unlock an electronic ballot for you and you vote while virtually in person?