I think I am going to have this on repeat in my house
https://youtu.be/zQ7vSBrjvao?t=38

4220 Musgrave Street Atlanta Georgia

because I'm sure you prefer left wing sources. Here is the left spun view source. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/judge-blocks-attempted-voter-purge-in-two-georgia-counties-ahead-of-runoffs/

each of these people has filed for change of address before the run offs....they were trying to be proactive and take care of it before they votes are cast and latches is used to say they cant remove people who moved

@JD~Jordan I say the moon is made of cheese prove me wrong.

lol look it up its a court case 🙂

It's irrelevant....

your theory has holes in it

Sweet now you're making a assumption about what my judgment is..m

I didn't say it wasn't Swiss cheese.

damn

You've got me because likely lots of cheese has holes in it m

Um, how are you coming to the conclusion that those 4,000 people are ineligible? The Court seems to disagree with you?

@Azizah past performance is usually a predictor of future results....

How many cases have been lost?

Just saying...

It ain't looking so good.

The court agreed and 1 judge overturned it

the judge that overturned it was stacy abrams sister....bit of a conflict of interest there dont you think?

Ok... so when I say "the court" I typically mean the judge unless its an appeals court.

So it looks like to me that the the election board in GA attempted to purge these voters... well it looks like they did and then they got sued and the judge prevented them from purging the names.

In one county the judge ordered that they allow the people on that list to fill out provisional ballots if they showed up to vote.

I think that it certainly give the appearance of impropriety so she should have recused herself, if that was the case

she was asked to recuse herself and refused

She should have recused herself... that was petty and stupid

these are the reasons people are skeptical....this is shady as hell

Gardner declined to recuse herself, writing in her ruling that the court “finds no basis for recusal.”

@Azizah, you just advanced to level 6!

Honestly even if I were the lawyer trying to stop the purge of those names I would have asked for the recusal... Even if its a clear cut case and the Judge did the right thing for her to be that close to issue given her sister was a huge force in gettting people registered in GA

too many. I've given up on following them. it's a complete joke...honestly, if someone shows me something that points to a conspiracy, or mass election fraud etc im willing to pay attention...from what I've seen it's all bs. small scale fraud here and ther, procedural errors and bs affidavits. it's all a show.

they did ask for a recusal Gardner declined to recuse herself, writing in her ruling that the court “finds no basis for recusal.”

I was actually going to say something like that but what's the point....

i know right. JD has the energy.

I was going to say nice before here with acknowledge that there was something of something of evidently value

Right.

Yeah. I 100% agree she should have recused herself. But, I do know that generally speaking judges are granted a great deal of leeway on issues of recusal. But to me as high profile as all this stuff is and Stacey being so very very involved in voter registration is seems just stupid for her not to recuse herself.

Stacy Abrams wasn't even involved in this election as a candidate.

@Zuluzeit
@Doc
Mccarthy was right Bruh. </s>

REDS in AMERICA
https://storage.googleapis.com/wzukusers/user-19551336/documents/5b947ac980620dYOjQgo/Reds_In_America-Whitney-1924-288pgs-POL.sml.pdf


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weather_Underground
👆
A lot of these people received early relsase and are actively participating in BLM, Antifa, and sunrise activist groups.

wow those are some serious blinders you have on there

How

she was bragging about how many new voters she was recruiting

Yeah, I know... but it just the appearance that is ugly. Stacey Abrams has been very very involved in getting voters registered in GA over the last 4 years.

So to me ... why have those very ugly optics? It just looks bad.

I'm not disagreeing @JD~Jordan