Message from @busillis
Discord ID: 795341053367550012
According to Virginia law, Chafin’s seat will be filled through a special election. The Code of Virginia states “when a vacancy occurs in the membership of the General Assembly during the recess of the General Assembly or when a member-elect to the next General Assembly dies...the Governor shall issue a writ of election to fill the vacancy.”
So 3 special elections
Republicans are done
Can’t be me because I’m not filtering out any information to the contrary. That’s you.
yea so it seems @leftingfighter33 added note seems the dems have found 100% Proof that republicans have had Dead People cast they vote for Trump. Waiting for confirmation in the #CNNTAPES
if 80 million Americans come out to tell me they voted for this man God Bless Their Soles. Long Live the CCP! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Slm5bvO-_5I
Holy shit, democrats want to pass 2k checks monthly until pandemic is over. These tards really want to crush the value of the american dollar. They don't understand what inflation is.
Seeing is way too many of them are confused what bathroom to use nothing will surprise me.
Great street conversions with all ages.🤣😂🤣🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
https://youtu.be/1MIiiTtVyoA
@EZZ, you just advanced to level 9!
You know what? I would be totally fine if democrats control all branches and implement UBI with 2k checks per month.
I would just sit back and enjoy the decline. Probably move out once it gets too bad.
This is no different than Greece borrowing billions to pay early retirees pensions. Sounds amazing until your country
Is in so much debt that you are declared bankrupt, nobody will lend you money and your currency has devalued.
Drink up🤐
Explain in what fantasy land any of those things actually happened but can’t be proven in court.
Btw...He was pointing at #45 Being the Best😁🇺🇸
Not like it should be contestable anyways😣
#melissacarone videos on TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/amp/tag/melissacarone
😂
You guys need to apologize for impuning this woman's credibility...
Apparently cam girl qualifies one as IT pro....
Cruz trying to manufacture a scene
I watched this as it was happening and it was so infuriating to me. They based their analysis on a false assumption and it is so detrimental to have false testimony presented without having the ability to question them directly.
They assumed that the data that was collected by Edison Research NEP and sent to the NYT (via JSON files) was an accurate representation of votes being tabulated in real time. They did not factor in how the data was collected, the methodology for determining how/when data is sent, the inherent inaccuracies in how the data is collected, and the process/method that inaccuracies are corrected during the exchange of data. Any good analyst makes sure that the data that they are starting is sound and that the assumptions with regard to data consistency are valid. These individuals do not appear to have made an attempt to do this at all.
They also made no attempt to normalize the data for current circumstances. They used data trends for mail in ballots from past elections as proof that there was fraud in this election without factoring things like the pandemic and Trump telling his supporters to not vote by mail. For their conclusions to be valid, they could compare it to in-person totals in GA; in-person/mail-in totals in states like FL/TX where Trump won and mail-in ballots were counted first; and states like NC where Trump won.
They appear to have started with a conclusion and tried to prove that the data supported it. Others have tried to make similar assertions based on the data feeds from election night and they have not stood up well against contradictory expert testimony. As a result, this analysis almost certainly would not stand up to scrutiny.
For a better understanding of how the data are collected, check out this: http://www.edisonresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Web-Entry-Team-Handout-2020.pdf
Cognitive bias!
Implant result prior to election -> Let bias take its course if results are questioned.
I used to respect Cruz... that is no longer the case. He's betting his political future on this and it is not likely going to work out well for him. He thinks that making a fake attempt at helping Trump will endear him to Trump supporters when he runs in 2024. It will not and it will galvanize non-Trump supporters against him.
The good news is that he is probably eyeing a 2024 Presidential run which will mean he will not be as focused on his senate reelection campaign. Something to look forward to in 2024... Cruz's failing presidential run and his losing his Senate seat.
Used to respect him too.
This is what you get when you try to play both sides.
When it's such a divisive idea.
I'm confused
Can we please leave the king of popoutof this
I can forgive the fervent Trump supporter that wanted to make sure that fraud did not happen who consequently signed affidavits about things that they questioned during the election. They are not experts and their motivations are generally sincere. People like these "experts" that should know better who prostitute themselves for money, 15 minutes of "fame", or free advertising are just despicable.
It's so sweet that you care so much for the feet of Biden voters. Such empathy is rare.
And people still wonder why others say Trump is divisive. This is the epitome of his divisiveness.