Message from @Whithers

Discord ID: 778085795172843520


2020-11-17 02:30:58 UTC  

Yeah, I really should not have spiked their hot chocolate with that much exlax. But they will be fine once those big players get out of the infirmary. 😉

2020-11-17 02:30:59 UTC  

Thanks @Shitty Kitty I'll do my best to stay true and not worry too much about catering to any one audience.

2020-11-17 02:31:09 UTC  

just want to say thanks to guys on what your doing

2020-11-17 02:31:19 UTC  

I think the success of the channel is because you give a middle of the ground perspective and don't shame anyone for a different opinion other than your own.

2020-11-17 02:31:26 UTC  

As you should in my opinion! It's 'watching the watchers' after all!

2020-11-17 02:31:53 UTC  

And both sides need watching.

2020-11-17 02:31:55 UTC  

@RobertGrulerEsq That is one of the reasons your show is good. You are effective at steel manning.

2020-11-17 02:32:00 UTC  

i was more impressed with your take on az law

2020-11-17 02:32:09 UTC  

Thanks @Theresa

2020-11-17 02:33:05 UTC  

@Whithers I'm looking up that term now, thanks, I think 😆

2020-11-17 02:33:09 UTC  

That your personal position slips every now and again helps too. Makes you genuine and demonstrates your effort to be fair.

2020-11-17 02:33:18 UTC  

yea Amusing huh Az he has a good grip on stuff there. If you ever visit there and get in trouble umm look him up...

2020-11-17 02:33:23 UTC  

I loved when you told the one commenter that you want to talk about these things because we're being told not to and then said you are welcome to hit a thumbs down. Excellent way to handle that.

2020-11-17 02:33:28 UTC  

Calling out both sides is what all the independents and moderates want to see, in my opinion anyway.

2020-11-17 02:33:42 UTC  

It appears to me as more nuanced than simple middle ground. It's bothering to articulate an opposing argument faithfully.

2020-11-17 02:33:55 UTC  

Steel Manning is the opposite of straw manning. The taking of the othersides position to argue it accurately as good as possible - perhaps even better than they do.

2020-11-17 02:33:57 UTC  

Agreed, not bad-faith strawmanning.

2020-11-17 02:34:13 UTC  

I've never heard of that term, I like it!

2020-11-17 02:34:39 UTC  

hard job i hear people talk about not reading post on pod cast but you go and start a pod cast that is reading the chat crazy

2020-11-17 02:34:42 UTC  

Some people invent the opposing argument or don't bother at all because it upsets people.

2020-11-17 02:35:09 UTC  

I learned the term from Eric Weinstein.

2020-11-17 02:35:42 UTC  

@Maw Yes. I think the silent majority in the US are the moderates who want to hear the true story rather than the obviously biased opinions of the media on both sides.

2020-11-17 02:35:44 UTC  

Steel man is a lot harder than straw man. You have to know for sure you're right, if you have a set conclusion.

2020-11-17 02:35:48 UTC  

Ahh thats some darkweb stuff there

2020-11-17 02:35:54 UTC  

people should get upset time to time its good for you

2020-11-17 02:36:28 UTC  

I learned steel man in college but they didn't call it that at that time.

2020-11-17 02:36:41 UTC  

I have been corporate censored by face book and Twitter. And so i looked for alternative. It is great to be able to interact with someone knowledgeable on a subject

2020-11-17 02:36:44 UTC  

Yea I figure if I split the middle and both sides are angry then that's more stuff to talk about in the chat!

2020-11-17 02:36:57 UTC  

I like to think of it as bipartisanship and fair ideological representation.

2020-11-17 02:37:11 UTC  

Mission accomplished on that tonight Rob. Lmao

2020-11-17 02:37:19 UTC  

I have a position that all forms of Marxism are anathema to Lockean Principle. I make value judgments on the political and economic from there.

2020-11-17 02:38:07 UTC  

this would be a great time to start a company like FB

2020-11-17 02:38:09 UTC  

For sure, fortunately during Q&A people weren't throwing around obscene language and insults everywhere as much as I thought they would.

2020-11-17 02:38:31 UTC  

During the actual presentation it was a bit different.

2020-11-17 02:38:46 UTC  

Well, @Maw , we can try harder if you were board.

2020-11-17 02:38:55 UTC  

I don't even look at the chat until the end so I miss all of that.

2020-11-17 02:39:07 UTC  

In which Locke does that principle appear? I have a pile of Locke which I've completely forgotten about with time.

2020-11-17 02:39:08 UTC  

Tonight was a bit critical of Trump's team so I had a feeling.

2020-11-17 02:39:20 UTC  

Yeah, it's understandable.

2020-11-17 02:39:24 UTC  

Tossed out a question about legal definitions earlier, should I toss it out again?

2020-11-17 02:39:28 UTC  

And personally I'm glad you were.