Message from @ImNotGas

Discord ID: 780629591349788703


2020-11-24 02:58:10 UTC  

I get it

2020-11-24 02:58:14 UTC  

It's not a realistic argument

2020-11-24 02:58:22 UTC  

But it feels good to say it.

2020-11-24 02:58:34 UTC  

the spirit of it makes sense

2020-11-24 02:58:40 UTC  

if you dont have a stake you shouldnt get to make decisions

2020-11-24 02:58:47 UTC  

Yes, skin in the game.

2020-11-24 02:59:02 UTC  

you should read starship troopers

2020-11-24 02:59:03 UTC  

@Jorgen Johnson points out the rub, though

2020-11-24 02:59:03 UTC  

lol

2020-11-24 02:59:07 UTC  

@RobertGrulerEsq However, while we don't pay taxes, our Soc Sec is supposed to be reduced by the amount of taxes we would have had to pay.

2020-11-24 02:59:26 UTC  

the way the government is run in that book is interesting

2020-11-24 02:59:56 UTC  

I've seen the movie

2020-11-24 03:00:21 UTC  

the book is actually a bit more intellectual

2020-11-24 03:01:12 UTC  

BRCC last broadcast I saw they were outlining how they would do a comedy movie about what govt would be like if they were in charge.

2020-11-24 03:01:30 UTC  

Yes @Whithers I heard from some financial people that they may want people to pay taxes on the PPP loan, that was given to people, in the amount that it was forgiven.

2020-11-24 03:02:46 UTC  

Like with student loans. If suddenly $50k is discharged /forgiven, you are paying taxes on that gift, in all likelihood.

2020-11-24 03:02:48 UTC  

well you normally have to pay taxes on forgiven debt i believe

2020-11-24 03:02:48 UTC  

@ImNotGas, you just advanced to level 4!

2020-11-24 03:02:59 UTC  

Some of that was deferred and some wasn't. I was not affected so I didn't track it much.

2020-11-24 03:03:11 UTC  

Yes but they didn't force your business closed, is the difference.

2020-11-24 03:03:17 UTC  

true

2020-11-24 03:03:52 UTC  

I have agreed with Shapiro that the govt. owes comp. because it took people's right to work away.

2020-11-24 03:03:52 UTC  

@RobertGrulerEsq would you agree with the opposite? Illigal immigrants that pay taxes get to vote?

2020-11-24 03:04:32 UTC  

Illegal immagrants should be removed. So, no, paying taxes is not sufficient.

2020-11-24 03:04:48 UTC  

Great question

2020-11-24 03:05:19 UTC  

I think there's a good argument there

2020-11-24 03:05:44 UTC  

Or 14-17 year-olds that pay taxes vote?

2020-11-24 03:05:46 UTC  

Ok, then lets say legal immigrants on visas

2020-11-24 03:05:50 UTC  

You want people with skin in the game

2020-11-24 03:05:54 UTC  

SPent a lot of my childhood around illegals. My foster brother came here illegal. Took us 22 years to get him naturalized. I understand a need for reform. But neither party cares.

2020-11-24 03:05:55 UTC  

@Whithers, you just advanced to level 12!

2020-11-24 03:06:32 UTC  

I'm in the voter integrity camp

2020-11-24 03:06:40 UTC  

i dont blame illegals for coming here, i blame our government for allowing it

2020-11-24 03:07:01 UTC  

and not prosecuting the people who hire them

2020-11-24 03:07:18 UTC  

Voting locally as they do for school boards? Maybe. Voting to determine our national leaders, legislators, and courts? no.

2020-11-24 03:08:25 UTC  

Facial recognition software should be used to vote. Advancing technology means we have to do more to keep our elections fair.

2020-11-24 03:08:58 UTC  

why dont we just use paper

2020-11-24 03:09:08 UTC  

My step mother was brought here by a church group to bolster their rolls when they would talk about needing donations. It took her years to escape the sweatshop they kept her in. Then Reagan was going to take her two children born here away and send herbac to Mexico. It is complicated.

2020-11-24 03:09:10 UTC  

with a receipt

2020-11-24 03:09:49 UTC  

@aiva I'm for raising the standards on voting, generally. the tax idea is of course a non-starter. but I get concerned about people voting for more and more taxes without having to pay for the increases.

2020-11-24 03:09:54 UTC  

@Jorgen Johnson So, dox everyone who votes for their opposition.