Message from @MatiLuc
Discord ID: 784069759774883870
Cognitive bias is eliminated by schooling.
Another one?
Yeah... you are correct. They voted not FOR Biden but checked his name as a vote AGAINST Trump. Which would not have happened with Bernie or Hilliary.
Heck... even that little old widowed lady that her dead husband got accused of voting in Georgia said that:
They asked her how she voted and she said first said "Biden - well not as much for him but against the other guys (meaning Trump)"
People are missing the fact that masses of old school Republicans not only didnt vote for Trump but wanted him out so bad they held their nose and voted for Biden.
lol Now I’ll definitely tune in. Thank god for right side reporting. Thanks for the link.
@JD~Jordan I suggest those who created Trump(r), knew this in advance. You cant drain the swamp, but you can easily alienate more than half the population going through a presidency insulting everyone. Im not sure the product had 8 year warranty. I rather suggest they needed it for 4 years.
People skilled in this kind of analysis, rarely miscalculate.
@MatiLuc did you see her prior testimonies? It feels like a dramatic shift in story. Like a folktale with one teller in rapid speed?
give me one good reason for Trump to drop the lawsuits and concede and I'll give you 170 million why he shouldn't https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/30/us/politics/trump-campaign-donations.html
@Dedkraken i saw her interview in lou D..Fox
That's crazy meglide
@Dedkraken yes is in the donations small prints
Is seemed like when she was on lou dobbs her story was she saw some remediation taken on ballots with problems but didnt know how the machine worked and she saw a mysterious van the contents of which she couldnt see.
Fast forward to what on Earth?
Yes that their star witness
Im not so sure. I have always felt that Trump was more a symptom than the problem itself.
Having said that he gave lots of people the cover to act on their worst impulses.
Most of the donations from average Americans (during a pandemic) are going to the campaign, makes me sick.
Is this “witness” for real? I haven’t seen her previous testimony. Wtf
@AdamS her previous one she was talking normal.. more calm.. i can see the difference from this one
Are these witnesses open to litigation from dominion?
@JD~Jordan I will not agree that any form of human is a problem - unless we see humanity as a problem for the planet. That said, I do agree. Trump(r) is a product sold. The reason that product has a market is not due to the product. The producers simply filled a void in the US, like UKIP filled one in the UK.
If we want to know how this demand for hostility in politics came from, we have to analyse contemporary psychological development. That must be an apolitical and unbiased discussion, or one only arrives at the opinions one had before the analysis starts.
One would hope. I mean otherwise it would set a precedence, where “court of public opinion” hearings will be normal.
I watched her previous one and she was not more calm... she got into an argument with one Senators
@JD~Jordan I suggest such an analysis should start with mapping out degrees of alienation and atomiziation for different age groups and socioeconomical cohorts.
I find it rather naive and dangerous to not recognize that some human behavior is detrimental to the whole
ELECTION OFFICIALS’ MANUAL Michigan Bureau of Elections Chapter 11, Updated October 2020
CHAPTER 11 ELECTION DAY ISSUES
https://www.michigan.gov/documents/sos/XI_Election_Day_Issues_266009_7.pdf
Well, I am of that opinion. Humans are sometimes aggressive, even murderous. It is as much part of human nature and therefore fluctuations in its manifestation, as is love and reproduction. That is a product of years of study and a massive chunck of cynicism. I hardly think myself naive, @JD~Jordan
I just observe that genocide is where humans originated. And they tend to follow that path sometimes.
I didn't say you were. I said that the position of not recognizing some human behavior is detrimental to society.
I really find it hard to believe this is an issue that needs debating.
I think it does, if one wants to understand Trumpism. It is clearly an aggressive response. If you are against human aggression, I would say understanding it is that much harder.
Suppression of women in some cultures is the norm but its clearly detrimental, and not just to the women in that culture, as an example.
Define detrimental?
just so I understand what you mean.
(Not beneficial)
Not beneficial for who?