Message from @Friedrich

Discord ID: 596597236717322250


2019-07-05 06:58:58 UTC  

I've listed why.

2019-07-05 06:59:02 UTC  

Ello Bork

2019-07-05 06:59:07 UTC  

Reking libtards?

2019-07-05 06:59:21 UTC  

hold on

2019-07-05 06:59:33 UTC  

red pill and atheist? that isn't logical?

2019-07-05 06:59:41 UTC  

a contradiction in itself

2019-07-05 06:59:52 UTC  

Well, Epic did since I don't have perms

2019-07-05 07:00:52 UTC  

Prove it's a contradiction

2019-07-05 07:00:55 UTC  

>pro choice
>atheist
>globie
>red pill
one of these things is not like the other

2019-07-05 07:01:19 UTC  

If I could have represented this chat in one phrase it would be...

2019-07-05 07:01:25 UTC  

don't do it

2019-07-05 07:01:27 UTC  

"Baseless assertions"

2019-07-05 07:01:30 UTC  

Mostly

2019-07-05 07:02:07 UTC  

i gave you proofs, then you accused me of using them out of context, i provide them in context, you say i'm wrong, despite you not even reading into the bible much

2019-07-05 07:02:51 UTC  

I literally shared what a Bible expert had to say.

2019-07-05 07:03:11 UTC  

You thinking that descriptive measures give you connotational measures is the weakest argument.

2019-07-05 07:03:19 UTC  

The Bible speaks in metaphors, not literally.

2019-07-05 07:03:40 UTC  

Mark 7:7

2019-07-05 07:03:40 UTC  

**Mark 7:7 - King James Version (KJV)**

```Dust


<7> Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men. ```

2019-07-05 07:04:07 UTC  

lol "experts" would know about philosophy being wrong if they were truly an expert

2019-07-05 07:04:25 UTC  

"Baseless assertions"

2019-07-05 07:04:33 UTC  

this is gonna get good

2019-07-05 07:04:49 UTC  

At least I admit to ignorance.

2019-07-05 07:04:53 UTC  

you claim that all the time when i provide you a base

2019-07-05 07:04:54 UTC  

;)

2019-07-05 07:05:16 UTC  

I'm not saying that you're wrong in terms of context, just that literal interpretations aren't a thing throughout the Bible.

2019-07-05 07:05:24 UTC  

It's a metaphorical stance, not a literal stance.

2019-07-05 07:05:26 UTC  

yes, there ARE

2019-07-05 07:05:41 UTC  

There are, but far less than literal ones.

2019-07-05 07:05:44 UTC  

not everything is a parable

2019-07-05 07:05:55 UTC  

You're a layman who takes the literal interpretations and presents them as proof.

2019-07-05 07:06:00 UTC  

in fact, Jesus often let us KNOW when he was using a parable

2019-07-05 07:06:11 UTC  

Rem says the Bible isn’t to be taken literally>uses Bible as a counter

2019-07-05 07:06:39 UTC  

he wants biblical proof

2019-07-05 07:06:50 UTC  

i give it, he says "no need more proof"

2019-07-05 07:06:56 UTC  

“in fact, Jesus often let us KNOW when he was using a parable” this ones new.

2019-07-05 07:06:59 UTC  

“… I have seen God face to face, and my life is preserved.” — Genesis 32:30

“No man hath seen God at any time…”– John 1:18

2019-07-05 07:07:00 UTC  

**Genesis 32:30 - New Revised Standard Version (NRSV)**

```Dust


<30> So Jacob called the place Peniel, saying, "For I have seen God face to face, and yet my life is preserved." ```

2019-07-05 07:07:00 UTC  

**John 1:18 - New Revised Standard Version (NRSV)**

```Dust


<18> No one has ever seen God. It is God the only Son, who is close to the Father's heart, who has made him known. ```

2019-07-05 07:07:21 UTC  

Jacob was wrestling an ANGEL, look at the context

2019-07-05 07:07:29 UTC  

Take this literally, it's literally a contradiction unless you take it with context and know the descriptive understanding behind it.