Message from @Bibleman
Discord ID: 596596044104597504
😃
Even myself
And check the description of what it means shared above by Epic Abe
It doesn't mean what you think it means.
That should be obvious.
it is obvious the bible says what it says
Lord.
you keep saying muh proofs, i give you muh proofs and you disregard them
are you trolling?
I ask for descriptions of the proof because you've been proven wrong.
Finding a reason to mute me? Go ahead.
i gave context, i gave proof, and now i'm proven wrong?
Is it who I think it is?
And under that context you were proven wrong.
oh no not you
I've listed why.
Ello Bork
Reking libtards?
hold on
red pill and atheist? that isn't logical?
Well, Epic did since I don't have perms
Prove it's a contradiction
>pro choice
>atheist
>globie
>red pill
one of these things is not like the other
If I could have represented this chat in one phrase it would be...
don't do it
"Baseless assertions"
Mostly
i gave you proofs, then you accused me of using them out of context, i provide them in context, you say i'm wrong, despite you not even reading into the bible much
I literally shared what a Bible expert had to say.
You thinking that descriptive measures give you connotational measures is the weakest argument.
The Bible speaks in metaphors, not literally.
Mark 7:7
**Mark 7:7 - King James Version (KJV)**
```Dust
<7> Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men. ```
lol "experts" would know about philosophy being wrong if they were truly an expert
"Baseless assertions"
this is gonna get good
At least I admit to ignorance.
you claim that all the time when i provide you a base
;)
I'm not saying that you're wrong in terms of context, just that literal interpretations aren't a thing throughout the Bible.