Finding a reason to mute me? Go ahead.

i gave context, i gave proof, and now i'm proven wrong?

Is it who I think it is?

And under that context you were proven wrong.

oh no not you

I've listed why.

Ello Bork

Reking libtards?

hold on

red pill and atheist? that isn't logical?

a contradiction in itself

Well, Epic did since I don't have perms

Prove it's a contradiction

>pro choice
>atheist
>globie
>red pill
one of these things is not like the other

If I could have represented this chat in one phrase it would be...

don't do it

"Baseless assertions"

Mostly

i gave you proofs, then you accused me of using them out of context, i provide them in context, you say i'm wrong, despite you not even reading into the bible much

I literally shared what a Bible expert had to say.

You thinking that descriptive measures give you connotational measures is the weakest argument.

The Bible speaks in metaphors, not literally.

Mark 7:7

**Mark 7:7 - King James Version (KJV)**

```Dust


<7> Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men. ```

lol "experts" would know about philosophy being wrong if they were truly an expert

"Baseless assertions"

this is gonna get good

At least I admit to ignorance.

you claim that all the time when i provide you a base

;)

I'm not saying that you're wrong in terms of context, just that literal interpretations aren't a thing throughout the Bible.

It's a metaphorical stance, not a literal stance.

yes, there ARE

There are, but far less than literal ones.

not everything is a parable

You're a layman who takes the literal interpretations and presents them as proof.

in fact, Jesus often let us KNOW when he was using a parable

Rem says the Bible isn’t to be taken literally>uses Bible as a counter

he wants biblical proof

i give it, he says "no need more proof"

“in fact, Jesus often let us KNOW when he was using a parable” this ones new.