Message from @Fading

Discord ID: 578885284847157248


2019-05-17 09:57:45 UTC  

I thought you meant that scientists call it acceleration instead of a force

2019-05-17 09:57:53 UTC  

MANY do

2019-05-17 09:57:55 UTC  

bc

2019-05-17 09:57:58 UTC  

thats whta it is

2019-05-17 09:57:58 UTC  

Why do you take issue with it being called a force?

2019-05-17 09:58:01 UTC  

Dielectric acceleration

2019-05-17 09:58:19 UTC  

due to >> Temperature, pressure, mass, density, bouyancy, electromagnetism

..and maybe some other things

2019-05-17 09:58:26 UTC  

Okay well you can claim that but the majority of scientists, and the scientific literature in general, claim it to be a mechanical force

2019-05-17 09:58:38 UTC  

I'm not saying whether or not that's right

2019-05-17 09:58:43 UTC  

But it's what's generally said

2019-05-17 09:59:07 UTC  

they "generally say" a LOT of things - a LOT of BULLSHIT

2019-05-17 09:59:22 UTC  

That may be but it doesn't change that it's what they say?

2019-05-17 09:59:30 UTC  

Again the distinction actually isn't all that important

2019-05-17 09:59:46 UTC  

A force simply means an interaction, in terms of physics

2019-05-17 10:00:32 UTC  

Gravity is simply proposed as the force that occurs between masses, and results in an acceleration

2019-05-17 10:01:58 UTC  

Whether or not you agree with that is fine I'm just going over what's generally claimed about it. People who disagree are very much in the minority is all (not that there's anything wrong with that)

2019-05-17 10:03:16 UTC  

Okay but what's your point? It's a force that pulls things, yes?

2019-05-17 10:03:22 UTC  

More correctly, accelerates

2019-05-17 10:03:24 UTC  

this here? http://prntscr.com/npr2ou is funny shit lmao <:lul:484994724118134784>

2019-05-17 10:03:27 UTC  

None of that is a problem

2019-05-17 10:03:33 UTC  

Why?

2019-05-17 10:03:38 UTC  

That's what the term is defined as in science

2019-05-17 10:03:43 UTC  

It's not the same as the colloquial usage

2019-05-17 10:04:22 UTC  

The term theory when used in general speech is closer to the scientific term "hypothesis"

2019-05-17 11:04:31 UTC  

@Fading What I meant was that I think we don't yet fully know why mass creates gravity wells/bend space time.

2019-05-17 11:12:29 UTC  

Well of course. It'd be nice if it was the Higgs Boson, but who knows

2019-05-17 11:13:12 UTC  

Or the higgs field

2019-05-17 11:13:37 UTC  

But electromagnetism as a cause can be ruled out im fairly confident

2019-05-17 11:13:58 UTC  

Well yeah lol, gravity is far stronger

2019-05-17 11:14:10 UTC  

weaker*

2019-05-17 11:14:11 UTC  

rather

2019-05-17 11:14:19 UTC  

What am I saying

2019-05-17 11:14:25 UTC  

EEG machines should attract all objects, not just metal if electromagnetism was the case

2019-05-17 11:14:32 UTC  

GRAVITY is far stronger than the electromagnetic forces

2019-05-17 11:14:43 UTC  

Yes

2019-05-17 11:14:46 UTC  

I need to stop drinking lmao

2019-05-17 11:14:50 UTC  

😂

2019-05-17 11:15:10 UTC  

Has anyone ever thought that gravity was electromagnetism? I can't see a reason to think that tbh

2019-05-17 11:15:10 UTC  

It's 2:20 pm here, just woke up

2019-05-17 11:15:23 UTC  

Mike says so