Message from @✧Mike Flatbird (Mike Blackbird)✧

Discord ID: 578883993798180865


2019-05-17 04:51:19 UTC  

Gn

2019-05-17 09:11:24 UTC  

@viherkasvi a theory (in science) means that something has been proven (and observed with a body of evidence). What do you mean by "it's just a force we call gravity"?

2019-05-17 09:39:57 UTC  

@Fading - ? "observing" something? like ..as in .."in the sky"? "PROVES" something/s? lmfao at you 😆

2019-05-17 09:40:11 UTC  

yeah ..you're "faded" alright 🤣
💤

2019-05-17 09:40:26 UTC  

_stay sleepwalking then kiddo...._

2019-05-17 09:44:31 UTC  

Sorry I should have been more careful with my wording: a scientific theory is a collection of facts and observations that form a cohesive theory, which is then capable of testing via. an observation of predicted results. The theory of gravity is exactly this and as much as it's simplistic to say anything is "proven", the theory of gravity is well supported. And I'm not sure what "It's just a force we call gravity" means.

2019-05-17 09:47:01 UTC  

they dont even call it a "force" techncially -- they call it (refer to it as) an "Acceleration" but

2019-05-17 09:47:40 UTC  

Well no they do call it a force, one that causes a mechanical acceleration

2019-05-17 09:53:47 UTC  

well no, they dont

2019-05-17 09:53:49 UTC  

mkayyy

2019-05-17 09:56:02 UTC  

But... they do? It's... called a force?

2019-05-17 09:57:10 UTC  

only the stupid ones do

2019-05-17 09:57:22 UTC  

there is no pushing or pulling "force"

2019-05-17 09:57:33 UTC  

--its accleration

2019-05-17 09:57:45 UTC  

I thought you meant that scientists call it acceleration instead of a force

2019-05-17 09:57:53 UTC  

MANY do

2019-05-17 09:57:55 UTC  

bc

2019-05-17 09:57:58 UTC  

thats whta it is

2019-05-17 09:57:58 UTC  

Why do you take issue with it being called a force?

2019-05-17 09:58:01 UTC  

Dielectric acceleration

2019-05-17 09:58:19 UTC  

due to >> Temperature, pressure, mass, density, bouyancy, electromagnetism

..and maybe some other things

2019-05-17 09:58:26 UTC  

Okay well you can claim that but the majority of scientists, and the scientific literature in general, claim it to be a mechanical force

2019-05-17 09:58:38 UTC  

I'm not saying whether or not that's right

2019-05-17 09:58:43 UTC  

But it's what's generally said

2019-05-17 09:59:07 UTC  

they "generally say" a LOT of things - a LOT of BULLSHIT

2019-05-17 09:59:22 UTC  

That may be but it doesn't change that it's what they say?

2019-05-17 09:59:30 UTC  

Again the distinction actually isn't all that important

2019-05-17 09:59:46 UTC  

A force simply means an interaction, in terms of physics

2019-05-17 10:00:32 UTC  

Gravity is simply proposed as the force that occurs between masses, and results in an acceleration

2019-05-17 10:01:58 UTC  

Whether or not you agree with that is fine I'm just going over what's generally claimed about it. People who disagree are very much in the minority is all (not that there's anything wrong with that)

2019-05-17 10:03:16 UTC  

Okay but what's your point? It's a force that pulls things, yes?

2019-05-17 10:03:22 UTC  

More correctly, accelerates

2019-05-17 10:03:24 UTC  

this here? http://prntscr.com/npr2ou is funny shit lmao <:lul:484994724118134784>

2019-05-17 10:03:27 UTC  

None of that is a problem

2019-05-17 10:03:33 UTC  

Why?

2019-05-17 10:03:38 UTC  

That's what the term is defined as in science

2019-05-17 10:03:43 UTC  

It's not the same as the colloquial usage

2019-05-17 10:04:22 UTC  

The term theory when used in general speech is closer to the scientific term "hypothesis"

2019-05-17 11:04:31 UTC  

@Fading What I meant was that I think we don't yet fully know why mass creates gravity wells/bend space time.

2019-05-17 11:12:29 UTC  

Well of course. It'd be nice if it was the Higgs Boson, but who knows