Message from @Christopher
Discord ID: 595768958603493387
All we can do is interferometry on starlight
This isn't really a solution, though. This is something that, visually, is vaguely similar to the bi-rotation of the stars in that it demonstrates why looking north or south changes the direction of rotation. The actual movement is the real problem. The stars themselves could be pixies for all that it matters - their movement simply doesn't make sense on a flat earth when both the celestial poles are visible from the same plane. Sure, you could speculate whatever made-up reasoning for it, but on a globe earth, *the movement makes perfect sense*. On a globe earth, the sky can ONLY rotate the way that it does. I don't have to come up with what-ifs. It just works. It's exceptional evidence the earth is a globe.
For example, the north celestial pole rises higher in the sky the farther north you travel and vice versa for the south celestial pole. This wouldn't be the case if the sky were a rotating cylinder around a flat earth- the poles would remain at the horizon at all times.
Yet they are both visible at the same time from the same place on a globe?
What, both celestial poles? Not unless you're at the equator.
actually, at the equator, you wouldn't see either pole. They would be *almost* visible. Like this pic:
http://sguisard.astrosurf.com/Pagim/SGU-From-pole-to-pole-PE-half-1200-cp9.jpg
So, only ever one pole at a time on a globe.
If the earth is flat, why doesn't anyone say that mars is flat
Curious
because mars is a luminary
Mars rover stuff is fake and gay.
Please elaborate on what luminary is, starting to get confused, is it a hologram?
"Luminaries" are a Bokeh effect generated by an ill-equipped lens struggling to focus on light from a planet like Mars.
those pictures aren't the same. They're made to look the same but if you look closely at some major details they're different
the bottom 2 are I guess but neither are a luminary
theres no source on any of the pictures
as for the egypt/desert photo, I highly doubt that someone took that much effort to replicate a NASA rover shot *exactly perfect*
its the same picture yeah
just put in two filters
It is literally the same picture
And we know that we can fake the photos as shown in the following messages
and how easy it is to fake
indeed
unless there are tagged NASA pictures and their Earth counterparts, this argument isn't as strong as others\
good point
I can imagine they bring up the point that the location is government property and civilians aren't allowed
lol on google the population is stated as 0
bring some food and water and supplies (along with some permission) nothing stopping FE from exploring predicted mars sites
there are some really fantastic pictures of the mars surface available from NASA
Hi lam how are you
Are those mars pictures cgi
No but FE will argue that they are
if they can't find the photo faked on earth they leap to CGI
@California Nightmare why flat earther
Where @California Nightmare
Look in lounge