Flatness is all due to perspective

Contrary to that Steven character who claims to be the reincarnation of a diety

Earth curves up after the perceptual split

You need a *cylinder* to simulate it, though.

hence, the rotation of a globular earth.

Simulate it? Cylinder? What do you mean

sorry, replying to sheeple

Nasa has yet to present valid evidence earth spins

Well it's proof there's more than one solution to the problem

Until we can scientifically validate stars.....

All we can do is interferometry on starlight

This isn't really a solution, though. This is something that, visually, is vaguely similar to the bi-rotation of the stars in that it demonstrates why looking north or south changes the direction of rotation. The actual movement is the real problem. The stars themselves could be pixies for all that it matters - their movement simply doesn't make sense on a flat earth when both the celestial poles are visible from the same plane. Sure, you could speculate whatever made-up reasoning for it, but on a globe earth, *the movement makes perfect sense*. On a globe earth, the sky can ONLY rotate the way that it does. I don't have to come up with what-ifs. It just works. It's exceptional evidence the earth is a globe.

For example, the north celestial pole rises higher in the sky the farther north you travel and vice versa for the south celestial pole. This wouldn't be the case if the sky were a rotating cylinder around a flat earth- the poles would remain at the horizon at all times.

Yet they are both visible at the same time from the same place on a globe?

What, both celestial poles? Not unless you're at the equator.

actually, at the equator, you wouldn't see either pole. They would be *almost* visible. Like this pic:
http://sguisard.astrosurf.com/Pagim/SGU-From-pole-to-pole-PE-half-1200-cp9.jpg

So, only ever one pole at a time on a globe.

If the earth is flat, why doesn't anyone say that mars is flat

Curious

because mars is a luminary

Mars rover stuff is fake and gay.

Please elaborate on what luminary is, starting to get confused, is it a hologram?

"Luminaries" are a Bokeh effect generated by an ill-equipped lens struggling to focus on light from a planet like Mars.

those pictures aren't the same. They're made to look the same but if you look closely at some major details they're different

the bottom 2 are I guess but neither are a luminary

theres no source on any of the pictures

to show that they are used publicly as pictures of mars

as for the egypt/desert photo, I highly doubt that someone took that much effort to replicate a NASA rover shot *exactly perfect*

its the same picture yeah

just put in two filters

It is literally the same picture

And we know that we can fake the photos as shown in the following messages

and how easy it is to fake

indeed

unless there are tagged NASA pictures and their Earth counterparts, this argument isn't as strong as others\

good point

I can imagine they bring up the point that the location is government property and civilians aren't allowed