Message from @raspberry
Discord ID: 596847148134301697
but the fact we cannot get an electron to go C is suspect enough. This is an easy experiment, take out the cathode Ray tubes from your TV and try yourself
@Drewski4343 hey sry I stepped out
I tested this in a lab at college. I am not disputing it. What I am disputing is the velocity of the earth. Zero if this works.
it's not zero, it can be whatever less than C. Whatever it is we will never see anything faster than C
and when you say velocity of earth
It must be relative to something else
@raspberry buoyancy doesn't need entropy/thermodynamics. But it's underlying cause is thermodynamics. For example, it assumes fluids have pressure to hold themselves up...entropy describes where this pressure comes from
In a vacuum light should not know where it is. Thus the speed should be C. Period. Any difference would be the velocity of the earth. Yet this experiment says the earth is motionless. Yet they deny that. Houston we have a problem.
it doesn't say earth is motionless, you can only say earth is motionless if you believe we should be able to get that electron I've been talking about to go faster than C lol
so go ahead and try, if you get the electron going faster than C you're right
If the electron is moving fastwr than light but only appears to move at speed C then it wouldnt be a problem
the earth could be motionless
If C were the constant they claim. You could measure the total velocity of earth. Yet it says zero. They deny zero thus C is totally debunked.
what do you mean by velocity of earth
Velocity relative to what
Or the earth is motionless. You can not have it both ways. That is religion not science.
I wouls imagine the limit c screws up measurements of significantly smaller speeds because its a limit
@demonwarrior2266 how do you prove gravity?
Cavendish look it up
Velocity related to absolutely motionless. C should be able to measure it. It is such nonsense to say if you are traveling near the speed of light say .9 C and shine a beam of light away it would still go at C. Not .1C. Yet that is their claim. Such nonsense.
like I said, if you can get the electron going faster than C you are correct, classical mechanics holds realtivistically and earth could be motionless relative to (whatever)
Cavendish isn't doable by individuals, only by govt labs
As of yet no one has been able to get an electron measured as going faster than C in any reference frame
Actually its not steve
Steve it's what believers of Einstein believe
The wavelength juat changes
if you can do this please do, take a cathode Ray tube out of your tv and crank up the voltage
How does light know where it is. Is light some god being or something? Light should not know. So if C is a constant we should be able to measure the velocity of the earth.
Or period actually
Yes and we should be able to get that electron faster than C @Steve Angell
so get to work
Cant remember which of the 2
@Fran relative to an aether? Things can move faster than c in general relativity
Again. All you say depends on the earth being motionless.
Except they can't relative to the local space time or "aether"
@raspberry send link
Are u talking about einsteinrosen bridges
But two galaxies can move apart faster than light
I would havw no trust in a C constant speed measuring machine