ive seen where the routes make more sense on a flat map

emergency landings that make mroe sense on a flat earth

That makes me want to swim

@jeremy Yes, on a 2d map of a 3d globe

Also when the Globers tried to prove their globe, they just keep raising more questions than answers

or 3d globe of 2d earth

Less than 40 percent of the standard globe model is even charted!?

is that supposed to be a rocket going up ?

I think it's a TLI burn

u have to go mach 33 to get into space ?

No.. It's mad Dan in my rocket

Yes it's a rocket

No mach 33 gets you to the moon in their model, mach 25 gets you to LEO in their model

@jeremy How long does it take to circumnavigate around the south pole?

XD

Notice how earth changes from convex to concave

Even WGS84 admits there's no map data for the geographic south

runway 33 for landing

Around the edge of Antarctica ?

Once again idk different accounts plus u have currents that move u faster or slower like jet streams

https://imgur.com/a/sToWhhR

Of earth is flat it should be a lot more miles than of u got around the same lattitude line in the north

No

U think it should be the same amount of miles as a globe

8k miles diameter

Centre of earth above is about 4k miles

3,963 I believe

At the equator

Slightly oblate

Tyson isnt totally full of bs

So by your logic if I build a 30km long spirit level it will touch the floor at both ends but there will be a gap in the middle

No

Won't work

Spirit level reads flat everywhere you are at given position

I'm talking about a MASSIVE spirit level

30,000m long