Message from @井瀬川ペトロ

Discord ID: 579135404234506254


2019-05-18 02:31:30 UTC  

It's not that it's stationary, it's just that the speed of light doesn't change relative to its position on the Earth.

2019-05-18 02:31:44 UTC  

Thus disproving the Aether.

2019-05-18 02:31:58 UTC  

I literally have no clue how you get a flat earth from this.

2019-05-18 02:32:29 UTC  

You’re conveniently forgetting to mention you’re using a theory to postulate your claim.

2019-05-18 02:32:44 UTC  

Thanks. 👍

2019-05-18 02:32:59 UTC  

@jeremy I think u should think about taking an intro to physics course online or at a local college it would answer a lot of your questions and if u went to the class in person u could go to the prof with any question u had and get good answers

2019-05-18 02:32:59 UTC  

Lots of the globe is theory on top of heart on top of theory

2019-05-18 02:34:54 UTC  

Coriolis force is from the atmosphere spinning different speeds as u go north or south no

2019-05-18 02:35:07 UTC  

@Derek Nelson Which theory?

2019-05-18 02:35:27 UTC  

?

2019-05-18 02:35:36 UTC  

Oof

2019-05-18 02:35:58 UTC  

oOf

2019-05-18 02:36:07 UTC  

"On top of a theory" *Which theory?*

2019-05-18 02:36:11 UTC  

OoF

2019-05-18 02:36:27 UTC  

Guys I ran out of milk :(

2019-05-18 02:36:29 UTC  

A theory is an observation of a fact. No more, no less.

2019-05-18 02:36:33 UTC  

Oh no

2019-05-18 02:37:02 UTC  

Hollow earth is fake prove me wrong

2019-05-18 02:37:03 UTC  

A theory is a belief.

2019-05-18 02:37:13 UTC  

It seeks to explain that fact to its best possible model;

2019-05-18 02:37:20 UTC  

@Derek Nelson And what belief?

2019-05-18 02:38:25 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/579135680056393728/image0.png

2019-05-18 02:38:38 UTC  

no a scientific theory is an explanation of a natural observation, a scientific law is an observation of a natural phenomenon

2019-05-18 02:39:07 UTC  

@Derek Nelson So you ignore the first definition to pick the one that suits you? Cha cha, real smooth

2019-05-18 02:39:12 UTC  

@Derek Nelson how about you look at the first one

2019-05-18 02:39:18 UTC  

Scientific theory is what scientists cite when they fail to prove a theory throughout by the scientific method.

2019-05-18 02:39:19 UTC  

Still didn't specify which theory

2019-05-18 02:39:23 UTC  

🍿

2019-05-18 02:39:30 UTC  

Y'all mind if I ***use the secondary definition***

2019-05-18 02:39:33 UTC  

i thinks thats called cherry picking

2019-05-18 02:39:35 UTC  

🍿

2019-05-18 02:39:42 UTC  

🍿

2019-05-18 02:39:53 UTC  

🍁

2019-05-18 02:40:00 UTC  

🗿

2019-05-18 02:40:07 UTC  

🍔

2019-05-18 02:40:07 UTC  

If a theory passes the scientific method in it’s entirety, it ceases to be a theory.

2019-05-18 02:40:31 UTC  

That's where you're wrong kiddo

2019-05-18 02:40:37 UTC  

@Derek Nelson The opposite, a scientific theory is an explanation of a natural event that can be *repeatedly tested and verified.*

2019-05-18 02:40:44 UTC  
2019-05-18 02:41:03 UTC  

according to google “A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world”