@✧Mike Flatbird (Mike Blackbird)✧ @Mr.science can I get unmuted?

@✧Mike Flatbird (Mike Blackbird)✧ I'm afraid I can't be heard.

It seems that press to speak is activated, however, I didn't pick that.

Can I get verified then?

Get me interviewd then

Please.

<@&484512215764828162> May I get interviewed, please?

I speak fluent english, sir.

Well, no, I'm half-japanese.

And the other half is french, however that is besides the point.

I don't mean to be rude, however I'm eager for that interview.

@✧Mike Flatbird (Mike Blackbird)✧

Can I get my verification? I have been brought here to "explain things"

No worries, you're one of the mods here after all.

Oh hello @97 Eleven

@97 Eleven Salut, comment allez vous?

@97 Eleven Vous ete francais aussi?

@the21cat It actually does

Ah, bien

@the21cat Well, like what? Give an example

^

*Please, somoene verify me, I'm an actual physicist and would like to explain things so that some people would understand.*

Oh well.

It can be proven, mate

We have done it

*several times.*

Okay, so

For the LAST TIME

Can I get interviewed?

?

What?

@97 Eleven Fair ;-)

What is the point of this chat?

Oh well.

ペトロ

貴方は日本人ですか?

んんん

Ah, of course

Fair

Also @Seeker of Truth, at what altitude was that picture taken

@Seeker of Truth "True" right

@Seeker of Truth Looks? Source?

How big is the focal lenght?

Has defishing been applied?

@Seeker of Truth I see. That's bizarre.

Seems like it was manipulated

Eh?

Weird

hmmmmm

If you wanna find out the truth

Wanna debate a physicist?

And you think I haven't questioned?

"To call oneself a truth-seeker, they must, at least once in their lives, question it all"

Then can you debunk any of said paradigms?

Newtonian physics?

Hell, kinematics?

Then debate.

Fair if you think so.

Hmm

Well.

If you have time, you are invited to disprove Newton's laws of motion.

No need to tell me.

Experiment by yourself and reach a conclusion.

False.

And, I know you know my answer.

Disprove that.

Disprove gravity.

Please.

Nice.

Firstly; as stated by Newton's second law of motion, a force equals mass × acceleration.

Newtonian.

Mass is the amount of matter in a given object

It is given mass in grams, kilos, and tons, generally.

To say something has mass is to describe the sum of its atom's mass.

@Seeker of Truth response?

I.e.

Let's say we have a block with Mass of 10 kilos.

Am I?

Well then respond.

Anyhow

To say a block has a mass of 10 kilos is to say that, the atomic mass of all of its atoms combined will equal 10 kilos.

Reminder that *kilos* is a unit of measurement; It is in no way a universal constant by which mass is measured.

Nice

Upon meeting actual knowledge, you flee.

Disprove gravity.

No, that is the einstenian model, which is quite irrelevant when discussing the "force" of gravity on Earth.

Hasn't? How so?

The universal rate at which things fall down when at the surface of the earth.

That is surface gravity; quite different from "celestial" gravity

?

Oh jesus.

When I say "surface" it is the lowest part of the Earth's atmosphere.

Okay, allow me to word it better

*Towards* the surface of the Earth.

Or downwards.

If you prefer.

Besides, density is a relation of mass over volume. It is not in any way a vectorial constant.

@jeremy Mass is a measurement of the ammount of matter in an object.

Amount of atoms with an object, basically

@jeremy Okay, I was about to talk about chemistry.

The thing is, the rate at which things fall down on Earth is constant.