Message from @Derek Nelson

Discord ID: 579137189242470410


2019-05-18 02:40:07 UTC  

If a theory passes the scientific method in it’s entirety, it ceases to be a theory.

2019-05-18 02:40:31 UTC  

That's where you're wrong kiddo

2019-05-18 02:40:37 UTC  

@Derek Nelson The opposite, a scientific theory is an explanation of a natural event that can be *repeatedly tested and verified.*

2019-05-18 02:40:44 UTC  
2019-05-18 02:41:03 UTC  

according to google “A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world”

2019-05-18 02:41:12 UTC  

This is about gravity, correcT?

2019-05-18 02:41:14 UTC  

If it doesn’t, it remains a theory. And is often still cited as scientific theory, Being postulated as if it’s proven, hoping the average joe is an idiot, and doesn’t know what they’re saying.

2019-05-18 02:41:18 UTC  

all hail google the knower of all

2019-05-18 02:41:34 UTC  

read above @Derek Nelson

2019-05-18 02:41:55 UTC  

@Derek Nelson So you know more than someone who works on the field? 🤔

2019-05-18 02:42:08 UTC  

Scientific theory isn’t the method that determines proof. The scientific method is.

2019-05-18 02:42:11 UTC  

@Credibly Charted sorry its not its about what a scientific theory is

2019-05-18 02:42:30 UTC  

what i said doesnt say that at all

2019-05-18 02:42:43 UTC  

Well we can easily just search up the requirements of a scientific theory and it's definitions

2019-05-18 02:42:49 UTC  

^

2019-05-18 02:43:28 UTC  

@Derek Nelson No, but the theory is put trough the scientific method.

A scientific theory explains a natural event of some sort. It makes predictions, and if said predictions are accurate and stand up to testing and verifiabilty, it remains as a theory.

2019-05-18 02:43:49 UTC  

It shouldn't be a debate about what it is

2019-05-18 02:44:03 UTC  

@Credibly Charted thats what im sayin man

2019-05-18 02:44:17 UTC  

Well if Derek was paying attention to what sort of theory I'm talking about, this wouldn't be a debate at all.

2019-05-18 02:44:25 UTC  

^

2019-05-18 02:44:25 UTC  

Scientific theory can take elements that are proven by the scientific method, and use it in their hypothesis. Like water being wet, for example. But a scientific theory can say something like, “water is wet, therefore ball earth.” And still completely qualify as scientific theory, and Fail the scientific method.

2019-05-18 02:44:42 UTC  

are you actually being serious

2019-05-18 02:44:48 UTC  

Eh? Really?

2019-05-18 02:44:49 UTC  

I think he is.

2019-05-18 02:44:52 UTC  

More serious than cancer.

2019-05-18 02:44:53 UTC  

_"do your research" intensifies_

2019-05-18 02:44:56 UTC  

i think im gonna cry

2019-05-18 02:44:57 UTC  

Lmfao Derek cmon

2019-05-18 02:45:09 UTC  

This is embarrassing

2019-05-18 02:45:18 UTC  

.

2019-05-18 02:45:20 UTC  

E

2019-05-18 02:45:34 UTC  

You can thank atheists who taught me this 10 years ago.

2019-05-18 02:45:48 UTC  

im atheist

2019-05-18 02:45:49 UTC  

Man, I don't know what sort of world you live in, but anyone with an ounce of scientific knowledge would laught at your assertions.

2019-05-18 02:46:00 UTC  

You're welcome I guess

2019-05-18 02:46:12 UTC  

atheist doesnt mean stupid it means you dont have a religion

2019-05-18 02:46:16 UTC  

*I'm refering to Derek*

2019-05-18 02:46:27 UTC  

@Derek Nelson Sorry to tell you Derek but saying "water is wet, therefore ball earth.” is an incorrect statement and the fact that that scientific theories have some type of explanation/proof to be their backbone

2019-05-18 02:47:05 UTC  

If a hypothesis can be unequivocally proven. There’s no need to even mention scientific theory. You would cite the scientific method.

2019-05-18 02:47:45 UTC  

Like, Derek, my man, boyo, compadre, home slice bread slice.

I literally study these subjects on a daily basis. I'm in college. I'm majoring in phyiscs, and, I'm afraid to say, you're wrong.

2019-05-18 02:47:50 UTC  

But real scientists know that earth curvature for example, fails the scientific method for a ball earth of 24,901 miles in circumference.