Tell you what if you show me something that's actually compelling I'd consider it.

Then a 800 dollar investment doesn’t sound so bad

Why is the cavendish experiment not compelling?

Not you babe

cavendish experiment

Oh ok

me gappy?

6. PRESENCE OF ELECTRO-STATIC FIELDS: https://imgur.com/a/pfqfVww https://imgur.com/Gzv5QgW

Yeah sure

Yes we know those exist sheeple

I was hoping the experimentation channel would give me something but that was a bit too optimistic of me

And pretend they don't exist during Cavendish

hm have you ever considered the isle of wight lighthouse

But you can test if there is any

And then rule it out

Ohhh it's alright, we don't need to ACCOUNT for static, well why would it? You mean that 100 volts per meter of altitude gained, ignore the metal balls dangling in air, they're totally NOT an antenna, noooooooo background radiation is fake except when you're near 3 mile island or TEPCO, but ptshhhhh it's grabbity, GRABBITY I tells you. And if you don't believe me then why why why you're a no good FLAT EARTHER that's what, a grabbity denying FLAT EARTHER and and and you're going to tell me about bubbles in space and the aether what nonsense haven't you heard you can buy spacetime now with the dark matter purchases and coming soon folks the tickets into space yeah just ignore all the people scammed to date it's real, REAL I tells you REAL SPACE TOURISM now cough up $250,000 goy, I mean guy.

I just said you can account for it...

And then rule it out

And they’re lead balls

The isle of wight lighthoue can be seen at a range of over 42 miles, the light should at that point be 992 feet below the line of sight

Why not use bismuth?

Hey if you can get a hold of some bismuth

By all means do it

sigh

ooooooy

🤠

<:CHECK6:403540120181145611> @DeathToPedophiles has been warned
```
reason: Bad word usage
```

what’s up with your username

zeppo

мм влаг дудка

эх удав

oops

h

sheeple

i have a question

@Deleted User i don’t like those topics of should we see this or not. There’s too many variables due to refraction. You have “looming” which makes an object appear higher. But you also have “sinking” which makes an object lower aka dissapear from the bottom up

So it’s inconclusive

but 996 feet

sheeple

Yes but refraction