Message from @GandalfTheGreen
Discord ID: 581521193417572352
Difference in height of the water above the stumps that id
himiwari lol
Is
@somekat Sorry lad, didn't know there were HILLS in STRAIGHT 3 MILES STRETCHES.
Perhaps you should pay more attention to the convo.
Some globies...
I tell ya
I did, you were acting like train tracks were perfectly straight, like a ruler device
If the water has more depth above stump in middle its concave
they bend like crazy
in reality
just try it
I'm curious
daniel water is flat thinking it bends down is crazier than the globe theory
Train tracks when laid, are not laid in accountance with the curvature of the earth.
Do you understand that?
Water looks flat
It is not EVEN CONSIDERED.
In the ENTIRE engineering process.
do you understand they are contour or w/e? so it would be irrelevant if they accounted for the curvature?
you can see more of the earth because of refraction
citizen i was jokin when i said himiwari
What if water is bending up slightly as it's being pushed out from a centre point above
Not in Canal's.
light is interesting
i guess its possible
unlikely as the globe imo
Naa concave makes way more sense than the globr
-_-
anything would make more sense than the globe
if you lay a train track, you only care about the single rail, because the rail needs to conform to the ground, many rails doesn't need any sort of calculations for curvature, what is ridiculous is expecting it to.
even if earth was flat, its not flat enough for perfect train tracks
they obviously bend
Water is always level
Flat
flat
these maniacs think level means curved lol
Physics
Of water