https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oINBtCwPs3Y

what do you think of this nan

xd

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gyroscope

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gyroscope

https://www.flickr.com/photos/47833278@N02/17229073722/

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/best-vacuum-ever-achieved.893876/

They are only claiming 10-11 torr or so: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042207X01003839. Their original expectation was 10-14, but this was not reached, possibly just due to bakeout issues.

Reference https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/best-vacuum-ever-achieved.893876/

"The pressure in outer space is so low that many consider it as non-existant. It has a pressure of 1.322 × 10−11 Pa. Pressure may be detected from the molecule of air or water hitting you."
-Google

star of david is a 6d simplex projection, it's only special because it was the second shape ever discovered outside of 3d(the pentagram being the first, the 5 cell simplex)

Kinetic Energy – This is the energy of the light due to its motion. Note that because a photon has no mass, its kinetic energy equals its total energy.Jan 12, 2015

DIANE TROYER

All things are possible for those who believe. - Mark 9:23

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9KXook6Kbg

?

can I be undeaf, I didnt even say anything

https://qz.com/1597197/nasas-space-station-mice-loved-microgravity/

join vc and talk to sheep eventually

the chat above lounge

click the word lounge

https://www.facebook.com/LADbible/videos/284009649165883/

http://www.apophysis.org/

https://www.scientificamerican.com/media/promo/upload/computers-vs-brains_2.jpg

bibleman

yes they do.

two bricks would have little force in that equation

one has to be a very large mass, and one very tiny

they would technically have measurable acceleration though, extremely-extremely small

I think bridges are the most designed object for gravity

like in engineering

most other stuff ignores is a bit more

the scale of 9.8m/s is about an atom per baseball, so the issue is finding two objects of that scale

@Human Sheeple nothing, that's just to scale gravity of earth, an atom(like a single hydrogen) falls towards baseballs at 9.8, we are about the size of an atom if earth was a baseball is another way to phrase it

9.8 m/s2.

seconds sqaured

nothing, it's just a scale MIT used to measure things at small scales, an atom moves towards a baseball at basically a similar rate as we fall to earth

do you know what hydrogen gas is? Imagine that smallest unit of that, that is an atom

you mean like a photo with a camera? or a microscope?

they can seem them with electron microscopes

but the photo comes from microscope

https://physicsworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/TEM.jpg

I guess, it's not not quantum physics where this is no pictures though, there are actual visible evidence of atoms

you can see with microscopes

its my unmute button xD

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-wbWGwZ7_k

I kinda dont understand

an object in motion moves in a straight line at constant speed unless an unbalanced force acts on it in space.

so you could use all the fuel at once, or use it slowly during the trip, either way, you will get there

http://sguisard.astrosurf.com/Pagim/SGU-From-pole-to-pole-PE-half-1200-cp9.jpg

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/624/media/images/71626000/jpg/_71626859_polarlenin_624.jpg

https://www.southpolestation.com/trivia/igy1/lenindc0.jpg

https://youtube.googleblog.com/2019/01/continuing-our-work-to-improve.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTY1Kje0yLg

upload the photo and post a link, then discord will add the photo

@quom https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/571258928005120010/571258946455732225/image0.png

there you go

I dont understand, you realize its a fake photo right

considering how he spelled stupid i dont think he cares

'netherlands' isn't a language lmao

so, in freefall

the iss has a horizontal movement of like 300 mph, the only issue I have picturing it is am I also moving at 300 mph, or is it just flying away from me as I fall down

do you expect it to be stiff or what

everything with mass has gravity is the claim

you typed that in like 4 seconds, so it's at the very minimum copy-pasta

you probably only choose 12 cause you're like 14 xD

so why would the flag not move on the moon again

so newtons laws don't apply to a flag on the moon because there is no wind in space, newtons laws in space suggest just plating the flag would put it into a motion that would never end.

Is there friction in the atmosphere of the moon to stop the flag from waving? It would wave forever from the time you place it.

a flag waving is no different than any other wave, the oscillation would cause an interference pattern that would make waves forever from the initial force of plating the flag unless another force acted on it to make it stop.

no, waves interference pattern is a real thing, and is not momentum. only outside forces will stop waves from repeating

@DerpyOwais https://youtu.be/k6TWO-ESC6A?t=329

Constructive or deconstructive interference will cause the wave of the flag to go on forever.

people from australia aren't criminals, the initial 'criminals' banished there are all dead, only descendants from them live there

yeah they took the land they were banished to, pretty fair deal

it was 'jail island' for basically 100 years, and then it gained independence.

we could put a prison on the moon if we wanted, but it would cost 2 million per person to move someone there, and 4 million a year to feed them

42

there are actually millions.

there is 10x more flat earthers, than transgender people.

I don't no, but the purpose of flat earth is to make individual observations to avoid scientific collaboration of any sort because of 'scientism' 😛 my opinion doesn't matter, it's do YOU think it's flat not me

it proves that 12" line of ground is flat.

we just need like

10,000 of those

you know though, you can fill a garden hose with water, and because water finds it's level, you could use it to measure curvature
https://youtu.be/4uwvx7-x98U

flat earth evidence is generally anecdotal, but the point is it's more direct evidence. Do you have any type of level that shows the earth is curved? is his point.

uhh, he means, like a tool.

I'd argue sheeple is a scientist

you need independent/dependent variables and a predication, observation alone is just blah

photographic evidence is grasping at straws compared to actual measurements from a tool

I understand it's from a camera, but a normal camera is only designed to capture light into photo, not measure curvature. Cameras are susceptible to refraction, angle of light, pixel and resolution ratings, and then the entire result is interpretation based after that

it's not lies, can you even prove the photo was stabilized

thats the issue with cameras, too many additional factors

@Reesey real science basically acknowledges that light goes farther than reality, so photos is a bad place to start because Science is claiming light is a bad way to measure it

it bends around the curve is what they say

@Reesey more or less, we can 'see farther' than we can really see, is what refraction causes

yeah that is practical

you can see around a corner with a glass of water, it's the same concept

also light gets into your house during the day, at absurd angles compared to windows, I get light in my bathroom in the basement with no windows, from all the way upstairs, this is also refraction at high levels

the point is you can see farther than the curve, the 8"per mile^2 for example never considers that refraction allows you to see farther also, and when they do, it's often misjudged

so like, you can see farther than 8"/m^2, but you shouldn't be able to without refraction, that is what I mean by light goes farther than reality, in a vacuum, you would only see 8"/m^2