not mine cause they are the same video

Anyone on?

@Credibly Charted That's some cancer right there.

I hate how in <#571747032260149258> they are making us believe flat earth

Wait what?

Ok

so its a ball hologram <:uh_duhh:583617741684998154>

Then how do we not fall through if it's a hologram

Checkmate hologlobies

No they actually cant

Thats perspective

And angular resolution

<@589270439889731634> find somewhere else to promote your addictions

>>ban <@589270439889731634>

<:vSuccess:390202497827864597> Successfully banned <@589270439889731634>

<#571747131786919944>

Addictions are pretty cool

@Abe Lover I laughed my way through that video. He is quite funny in the way he speaks nonsense and valid points.

First he says the sun would have to move faster down south then says well that does not make sense. Then he says the winds are faster down south and ignores what he had earlier said about how the sun would have to move faster down south. Guess because he dismissed it out of hand.

Not that I agree with that model I do not.

Later he tells the story about how Neptune was found using gravity. Hmmm. Strange he never considers that could be a fairy tale told only told after finding Neptune.

Funny when he says absolute motion does not exist and complains because the video shows what science claims about the movement of the planets and sun. Absolute motion does not exist. Right. Relative motion is the only thing that exist. Hello you just went against what you had said. This is relative motion. Why do you want to fight about wrong term used. I agree that in this model that absolute motion would be impossible to know. However it was clear that he was referring to relative motion of the sun within the Milky way. That is what science says. Set up this wrong word used as a strawman then knock it down. Wow you just proved you are dishonest.

https://youtu.be/KHLKeZiKgbY

Anyway. Just explaining why it made me laugh. Professor. Wow that really puts shame to real professors. Funny because I sort of agree with him just not the strong bias he is showing and indignation that someone dares to disagree that the earth is a ball.

Many strawman set up to knock down. Like dropping a ball on a moving vehicle. Sort of proves gravity but has nothing to do with mass to mass attraction which was the claim he was pointing to. That is just a theory and not proven.

I can see Norfolk VA from 40 miles away. No curve. Every sailboat I can see top to bottom some 40 miles away. No it is flat.

Where is the curve?

Ok

So how can you provided evidence to your claim?

You claim FE is a psyop

What is your evidence.

Well it was a psyop. Guess whoever did that was not informed the earth is flat so a bad psyop to do.

I can admit that I know it's not flat anymore.

But I also admit, that I know it's not the globe we are told.

I have not seen any solid evidence of a curve.

Nor will you.

Because your eyesight doesn't work that way.

As to its shape. Four dimensions is my guess.

I don't know why it's "picking a sid"

*side"

I think that's a pretty ignorant way of thinking.

Did you "pick a side" when it came to FE?

Or did you merely discover information you didn't have before?

And I agree with that.