Message from @Bibleman

Discord ID: 590688520255832080


2019-06-18 23:35:22 UTC  

How does concave earth explain water sticking onto walls or people walking sideways

2019-06-18 23:35:26 UTC  

We went on a voyage. On the ninth floor the distant water was level with us. On the eleventh we looked down. On the seventh up. I could not understand that. Eventually I came to understand that we simply cannot see waves that are a mile apart. Those are the highest ones. We dropped anchor and then I saw a lot of waves i had not seen till we did that. These were not even the highest ones.

2019-06-18 23:35:55 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/590686161702223886/image0.jpg

2019-06-18 23:36:06 UTC  

What do you think this guy thought?

2019-06-18 23:36:09 UTC  

Yes, Just as many problems as a round earth.

2019-06-18 23:36:53 UTC  

If there’s any concave earth I would ascribe to. It would be that.

2019-06-18 23:37:01 UTC  

Not an inverse sphere.

2019-06-18 23:37:14 UTC  

I was thinking the same

2019-06-18 23:37:26 UTC  

It does not work. The water would not stay as we see it.

2019-06-18 23:38:23 UTC  

The water flows on earth. It does have different effects throughout the year. Leading some to think the water curves up or down. And when it’s entirely not moving, it’s completely level.

2019-06-18 23:38:49 UTC  

That's my hang up, as well. I honestly haven't done enough research into hollow or concave earth to know what they think about water, but as far as I know, water is relatively flat.

2019-06-18 23:39:19 UTC  

There is a reason we use the term sea level. It is level not rounded.

2019-06-18 23:39:57 UTC  

Water flows to maintain level. So that picture can not work.

2019-06-18 23:40:34 UTC  

At least on a ball mass to mass attraction would be a possibility were it real.

2019-06-18 23:40:47 UTC  

For all I know, that guy was only working off a handful of information he gathered for one time of the year.

2019-06-18 23:40:55 UTC  

And not another.

2019-06-18 23:42:38 UTC  

It was the first flat earth map I saw that even began to make sense. Eventually I came to understand it was impossible. Water maintains level.

2019-06-18 23:43:09 UTC  

What does it mean when the text turns red. Retry got it to post?

2019-06-18 23:43:12 UTC  

Either way for me, from a biblical standpoint. It has to be similar to that. An inverse sphere doesn’t work. You can’t say the most high is above all things with terrestrial earth above him when he’s on the inside of a ball.

2019-06-18 23:43:32 UTC  

Means your signal was interfered with.

2019-06-18 23:45:17 UTC  

The most high, relatively speaking though?

2019-06-18 23:46:26 UTC  

We do not know what is down past the ice wall. So I look at it that way. The four corners are down there somewhere.

2019-06-18 23:47:01 UTC  

I’m talking about God above us. Not where up and down are relative, when those two directions are fixed on a stationary surface.

2019-06-18 23:47:04 UTC  

So the map sort of makes sense just not the curves.

2019-06-18 23:47:53 UTC  

I think of is like a snow globe. God on the top of it earth flat and in the middle. Hell down below.

2019-06-18 23:48:02 UTC  

I would call it shoel.

2019-06-18 23:48:13 UTC  

Whether on a ball, or inverse ball, up and down are literally relative all over the place, depending where you are.

2019-06-18 23:48:54 UTC  

Yes gravity is very strange in some places.

2019-06-18 23:51:12 UTC  

We know earth is stationary. We know when bodies of water aren’t being filled or drained, they are absolutely flat. So, I’m sure we have a consensus on that.

2019-06-18 23:52:10 UTC  

It's not completely flat but that's just nitpicking

2019-06-18 23:52:21 UTC  

Heh.

2019-06-18 23:53:34 UTC  

gravity is an unproven theory - - a label given to other phenomenon
it is a misrepresentation

2019-06-18 23:54:20 UTC  

I'm not talking about gravity but ok

2019-06-18 23:55:06 UTC  

What causes gravity is unknown.

2019-06-18 23:55:26 UTC  

lies of scientism is the cause of gravity

2019-06-18 23:55:50 UTC  

It is not mass to mass attraction. That is provably false.

2019-06-18 23:56:12 UTC  

Scientism religion. Yes.

2019-06-18 23:56:54 UTC  

I’ve found the biggest problem is with the theory being inserted into gravity’s definition, (aka, where a force pulls mass to the center of earth.) That part is the theory. -However, the mathematical equations still work even on a flat earth, and it has nothing to do with mass being attracted to mass.

2019-06-18 23:57:23 UTC  

What equations?

2019-06-18 23:57:24 UTC  

Exactly.

2019-06-18 23:57:37 UTC  

Like how fast you would fall.