At least on a ball mass to mass attraction would be a possibility were it real.

For all I know, that guy was only working off a handful of information he gathered for one time of the year.

And not another.

It was the first flat earth map I saw that even began to make sense. Eventually I came to understand it was impossible. Water maintains level.

What does it mean when the text turns red. Retry got it to post?

Either way for me, from a biblical standpoint. It has to be similar to that. An inverse sphere doesn’t work. You can’t say the most high is above all things with terrestrial earth above him when he’s on the inside of a ball.

Means your signal was interfered with.

The most high, relatively speaking though?

We do not know what is down past the ice wall. So I look at it that way. The four corners are down there somewhere.

I’m talking about God above us. Not where up and down are relative, when those two directions are fixed on a stationary surface.

So the map sort of makes sense just not the curves.

I think of is like a snow globe. God on the top of it earth flat and in the middle. Hell down below.

I would call it shoel.

Whether on a ball, or inverse ball, up and down are literally relative all over the place, depending where you are.

Yes gravity is very strange in some places.

We know earth is stationary. We know when bodies of water aren’t being filled or drained, they are absolutely flat. So, I’m sure we have a consensus on that.

It's not completely flat but that's just nitpicking

Heh.

gravity is an unproven theory - - a label given to other phenomenon
it is a misrepresentation

I'm not talking about gravity but ok

What causes gravity is unknown.

lies of scientism is the cause of gravity

It is not mass to mass attraction. That is provably false.

Scientism religion. Yes.

I’ve found the biggest problem is with the theory being inserted into gravity’s definition, (aka, where a force pulls mass to the center of earth.) That part is the theory. -However, the mathematical equations still work even on a flat earth, and it has nothing to do with mass being attracted to mass.

What equations?

Exactly.

Like how fast you would fall.

^

Oh

Acceleration

How far in 3 seconds. At what velocity. On and on.

Well the equation definitely has problems because it assumes the density of the air being constant

Not if you take it into consideration.

How would you tbough?

I'm curious

The math allows that.

Is there another formula

It becomes a rather complicated formula. Calculus would be required most likely.

When I took it that was part of what we worked on.