Accurate maps are actually based on something much more than flat earth.

@GandalfTheGreen well best method was horizon drop with altitude

And you can't even wrap your head around that.

lol

@GandalfTheGreen what are they based on

What about horizon drop from 0 altitude?

from 0 altitude?

Why would you even have to go up?

Wouldn't a circle be BENDING AWAY FROM YOU

you wouldn't see anything but a infinitely close horizon

YOU INSOLENT PEICE OF SHIT

b/c of the curvature

This cannot happen on ANY form of ball

THAT'S THE POINT

that agrees with me though

If you were lying down, on a fucking ball, you'd see shit literally curving away from you CLOSER

yes

the horizon is closer when you're shorter

Why does nobody understand that you have to be even with the surface?

Why is that so difficult to understand.k

@GandalfTheGreen sorry man i don't see the problem

Not suprised. I'll be glad to show it to you!

where is the problem

Cartography, surveying, laser sighting, angular resolution, diffraction, refraction, atmospheric lensing, and the limitations of light and the human eye **ALL** prove you wrong.

!mute @MrGiggles Cog Diss. It's broken.

How is everyone else doing?

Rest in pepperoni

Fine. Thanks.

I think he has had like 10 different accounts. Where claims he has ‘rekt’ all of us.

Very epic

Loses debate, claims to win debate

<:trolled:555217274907262976>

Ngl he totally rekt me

What more proof is there then reality? If you set the bar to what you can prove the earth is always flat

If you have to say you beat someone in. Debate you didn’t

That’s up to other people to decide

For my chem final tmrw should I give mainstream answers or serve them a helping of truth

Depends on how precisely you can articulate answers that may be contradictory to the purposed answer they wish you to give.

Yeah if you can back up an answer that goes against mainstream. What can they do?